Gregory L. Taddonio

How Judge Taddonio rules, drawn from 14 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Position
bankruptcy
Commissioned
2013-07-01
Signed orders read
14

How Judge Taddonio decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Reconsideration is treated as an exceptional remedy because it disrupts the finality of a decision.

“It is well settled that a motion for reconsideration seeks an extraordinary remedy that upsets the finality of a decision and therefore should be granted only sparingly.”

For below-median Chapter 13 debtors, Schedule J should estimate the debtor's own actual expenses rather than substitute generalized standards.

“Put simply, the Debtors were charged with estimating their actual expenses, not simply plugging in ‘estimates’ that are neither theirs, nor current, nor even expenses.”

Procedural preferences

Lien-avoidance calculations should quantify every component rather than leave the court to reconstruct the arithmetic.

“it is imperative that the moving party show their work.”

Cautions

Undisputed facts do not warrant summary judgment when the movant has not shown a present right to relief under the governing contract.

“the Debtor has not established a present right to payment within the bonds’ coverage.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Brian L. DeCerb
18-22681-GLT · 2026-05-21
Motion for reconsideration (Brian L. DeCerb) Denied

“In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion of even date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Motion is DENIED.”

In re Marissa R. Dunn
24-21065-GLT · 2026-04-01
Motion to preclude postpetition fees (Ronda J. Winnecour, Chapter 13 trustee) Granted in part

“The Motion to Preclude is GRANTED IN PART. The charges requested by Pennymac in the Notice of Post-Petition Mortgage Fees, Expenses, and Charges filed on September 26, 2024 are disallowed only to the extent of $242.”

In re Sharon Morosetti
25-20897-GLT · 2026-02-13
Motion to avoid lien (Sharon Morosetti) Granted in part

“The Debtor’s Motion to Avoid Lien Pursuant to 11 U.S.C.A. §522(f)(2) [Dkt. No. 76] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.”

In re Todd Elliott Koger; In re Elliott-Todd Parker Koger; Koger v. Usoroh
20-23340-GLT; 24-21081-GLT; 24-02040-GLT · 2025-09-30
Motion to reopen (Todd Elliott Koger, Sr.) Denied

“The Section 522(h) of the Bankruptcy Code Motion to Reopen [Dkt. No. 125] is DENIED.”

Motion to reinstate stay and nullify sheriff sale (Todd Elliott Koger, Sr.) Denied

“Request for Order to Nullify Sheriff’s Sale [Dkt. No. 137] is DENIED.”

Motion to remove trustee and reinstate stay (Todd Elliott Koger, Sr.) Denied

“The 11 U.S.C. § 324 Motion Invoking the Catch-all Misconduct Provision of 11 U.S.C. § 101(11)(14)(E) (sic); Request for Reinstatement of 11 U.S.C. § 362 Stay; Joinder of 24-02040-GLT and Stay of 24-21081-GLT; and Request for Order to Nullify Sheriff’s Sale [Dkt. No. 147] is DENIED.”

Motion to consolidate (Todd Elliott Koger, Sr.) Denied

“Adversary Proceeing No. 24-2040-GLT [Dkt. No. 186] is DENIED.”

Motion to dismiss bankruptcy case (Isaac Usoroh) Granted

“The Motion, Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 707, to Dismiss Chapter 7 Case [Dkt. No. 44] is GRANTED. This chapter 7 case of the Debtor, Elliott-Todd Parker Koger, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE”

Motion to vacate judgment and strike (Elliott-Todd Parker Koger) Denied

“Todd Parker Koger’s Response [Dkt. No. 46] is DENIED.”

Motion to avoid transfer (Elliott-Todd Parker Koger) Denied

“The Section 522(h) of the Bankruptcy Code Motion [Dkt. No. 68] is DENIED.”

Motion for reconsideration (Elliott-Todd Parker Koger) Denied

“The Motion for Reconsideration of August 15, 2024 Order (sic) Record Has Confused the Pro Se Litigants of the Scheduling (sic) [Dkt. No. 75] is DENIED.”

Motion for reconsideration (Elliott-Todd Parker Koger) Denied

“The Motion for Reconsideration of September 9, 2024 Order (sic) Bankruptcy Court Mistakenly Cites PAHAF 19868 as State Issue [Dkt No. 87] is DENIED.”

Motion for sanctions and injunctive relief (Elliott-Todd Parker Koger) Denied

“Request for Injunctive Relief and Damages [Dkt. No. 125 1] is DENIED.”

Motion for summary relief (Elliott-Todd Parker Koger, Todd Elliott Koger, Sr., and the Koger Family) Denied

“The Plaintiffs’ Amended Motion for Summary Relief [Dkt. No. 43] is DENIED.”

In re Justin Thompson Krenitsky and Jennifer Lynn Krenitsky
24-22306-GLT · 2025-04-07
Objection to plan confirmation and motion to dismiss (Ronda Winnecour, Chapter 13 trustee) Granted in part

“The Chapter 13 Trustee’s Objection to 10/16/24 Plan and Request Case be Dismissed is SUSTAINED and plan confirmation is DENIED. The trustee’s alternative request for dismissal is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

Semanderes v. PNC Bank, N.A.
23-02092-GLT · 2025-04-01
Judgment on the pleadings (Maria Savakis, George Savakis, and Hercules Painting Company, Inc.) Denied

“the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is DENIED.”

Insulation Coatings & Consultants, LLC v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
23-01002-GLT · 2025-03-18
Motions to dismiss (Liberty Mutual Insurance Company) Granted

“The Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.”

Summary judgment (Insulation Coatings & Consultants, LLC) Denied

“The Debtor’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on Liability is DENIED.”

Interval v. Internal Revenue Service (In re Interval)
· 2016-03-07
Motion for contempt (The debtors) Denied

“1.The motion is DENIED.”

Hertz Gateway Center, L.P. v. KDA Group, Inc. (In re KDA Group, Inc.)
· 2017-09-20
Motion for allowance of administrative claim (Hertz Gateway Center, L.P.) Granted in part

“Hertz’s Motion for Allowance and Payment of Administrative Claim for Post Petition Rent is GRANTED IN PART with respect to the June and July rental obligations and DENIED IN PART with respect to the August rental obligations.”

Crawford v. 2827 California Inc. (In re Tam of Allegheny LLC)
· 2017-09-29
Objection to trustee final report (2827 California Inc. and Mary Lou Filsinger) Denied

“The objection to the Final Report is overruled.”

In re Carrie Pinnick
· 2019-03-08
Motion to dismiss bankruptcy case (Carrie Pinnick) Denied

“the Court denied the motion, finding that dismissal of the case would be unfairly prejudicial to creditors in the absence of a proposal assuring them payment in full.”

Anderson v. Commonwealth Renewable Energy, Inc. (In re Commonwealth Renewable Energy, Inc.)
· 2016-04-21
Motion to dismiss bankruptcy case (Ruth F. Anderson and Kathy L. Anderson) Granted

“the Court finds ample cause for the case to be dismissed pursuant to section 1112(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

One sampled matter had terminated; the two newer matters remained pending and supplied the motion timelines.

Draft for Judge Taddonio with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Taddonio, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Taddonio's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace