John Raymond Hazel

United States District Court for the Western District of New York district Deceased · served 1900–1931 Appointed by William McKinley (Republican) 25 signed orders read

Judge Hazel no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Hazel decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Hazel required facts establishing probable cause rather than conclusions or suspicions in a search-warrant affidavit.

“bare conclusions based on surmise and conjecture only, without facts to support them.”

In immigration habeas review, Hazel treated a full pardon as eliminating the conviction on which deportation depended.

“The royal decree pardoning the relator is entitled to conclusive effect, as it wipes out the offense and consequent conviction.”

Procedural preferences

Hazel required negligence pleadings and particulars to identify the facts and defects the opposing party had to meet.

“there must be a fair and reasonable compliance with defendant’s demands”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States ex rel. Chumura v. Smith
· 1927-06-15
Petition for writ of habeas corpus (petitioner) Granted

“The writ must therefore be sustained, with permission to begin another proceeding.”

In re Reinhoudt
· 1927-07-21
Motion for injunction (bankrupt) Denied

“the bankrupt is not entitled to an injunction restraining plaintiff”

The William H. Trusedale
· 1927-12-12
Exceptions to damages award (respondent) Denied

“Exceptions overruled.”

The Coddington
· 1923-02-15
Motion to compel interrogatory answers (libelant) Granted in part

“Interrogatories (j), (1), and (m) are directed to the evidence by which certain defenses are sustainable, and therefore they need not be answered.”

Ebsary v. Raymond & Whitcomb Co.
· 1924-03-05
Motions to strike (defendant) Denied

“The motion to strike out allegations in the complaint is denied.”

Farm Mortgage & Loan Co. v. Willett
· 1923-04-03
Motion to set aside judgment (movant) Denied

“Motion denied.”

United States ex rel. Gogoyewicz v. Flynn
· 1927-02-03
Petition for writ of habeas corpus (petitioner) Denied

“The writ is dismissed.”

United States v. Swierzbenski
· 1927-03-28
Motion in arrest of judgment (defendant) Denied

“The motion for arrest of judgment is denied.”

Farbwerke Vormals Meister Lucius & Bruning v. Diarsenal Co.
· 1927-03-10
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Motion to dismiss denied.”

Canadian Co-Operative Wheat Producers, Ltd. v. Mathews Steamship Co.
· 1928-10-03
Exceptions to answer (libelant) Granted

“The exceptions are sustained, and defendant directed -to amend its answer.”

Slocum v. Erie Railroad
· 1929-03-13
Motion for bill of particulars (defendant) Granted

“The motion of defendant ig granted”

The Older
· 1929-07-02
Exceptions to libel (claimant) Denied

“The exceptions both to the libel and the interrogatories are overruled.”

Motion for rehearing (claimant) Denied

“Motion for rehearing denied.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No electronic docket sample was available for a historical caseload description.

A historical record

Judge Hazel no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.