Vincent L. Briccetti

How Judge Briccetti rules, drawn from 21 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Position
district
Status
Senior status
Appointed by
Barack Obama (Democratic)
Commissioned
2011-04-14
Education
Columbia University, B.A. (1976); Fordham University School of Law, J.D. (1980)
Signed orders read
21

How Judge Briccetti decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A party seeking arbitration should itself honor the arbitration agreement; a material refusal to arbitrate can defeat a later effort to compel the other side into arbitration.

“defendant’s refusal to arbitrate constitutes a material breach of the Arbitration Agreement, and therefore defendant cannot compel arbitration.”

Procedural preferences

Late amendments face close scrutiny when discovery has closed and the new claims would require reopening discovery and delaying trial.

“Re-opening discovery will cause significant delay in the resolution of those claims and the resolution of the action as a whole.”

Cautions

He warns that knowingly submitting a fabricated government document is fraud on the court and can lead to dismissal with prejudice.

“Should discovery reveal plaintiffs knowingly submitted a fake government document to bolster their claims, such conduct would constitute a fraud upon the Court and will result in the dismissal of this case with prejudice.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Walsh v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (I.B.E.W.) Local 503
· 2014-10-07
Motions to remand (plaintiffs) Denied

“Plaintiffs’ motion to remand is DENIED.”

iMedicor, Inc. v. Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
· 2013-04-29
Motion to amend (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend the complaint is DENIED.”

Coble v. COHEN & SLAMOWITZ, LLP
· 2011-10-31
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint (Doc. # 9).”

Clavin v. County of Orange
· 2014-08-04
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED.”

Hettler v. Entergy Enterprises, Inc.
· 2014-03-28
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Denied

“Defendants’ motion to dismiss is DENIED.”

Grogan v. Blooming Grove Volunteer Ambulance Corp.
· 2013-01-22
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted

“Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.”

Prestige Brands Inc. v. Guardian Drug Co.
· 2013-04-18
Motions to dismiss (third-party defendant) Granted

“Third-party defendant NuSil Technology LLC’s motion to dismiss the third-party complaint is GRANTED.”

Jackson v. Peekskill City School District
· 2015-05-01
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“Defendants’ motions to dismiss are GRANTED.”

Ryan v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.
· 2013-02-21
Motion to compel arbitration (defendants) Granted

“Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the parties are ordered to arbitrate plaintiffs claim under the Binding Arbitration Agreement.”

Martinez v. Bakery & Confectionery Union & Industry International Pension Fund
· 2012-06-06
Judgment on the pleadings (plaintiffs) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, plaintiffs’ motions for judgment on the pleadings are GRANTED and defendants’ motion are DENIED.”

Judgment on the pleadings (defendants) Denied
Alvarado v. Westchester County
· 2014-04-24
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted in part

“Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to (i) all claims against defendants Diaz, Smithson, and Astorino in their official capacities, and (ii) all claims *219against Diaz and Astorino in their individual capacities. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is DENIED as to (i) plaintiffs’ Monell claim against Westchester County, and (ii) plaintiffs’ Section 1983 claim against Smithson in her individual capacity.”

Reyes v. Krasdale Foods, Inc.
· 2013-05-22
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 492 days (N = 6).

The six sampled civil matters were divided among labor and employment disputes, civil-rights cases, and one motion to vacate a sentence.

Draft for Judge Briccetti with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Briccetti, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Briccetti's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace