Lorna Gail Tiangco Schofield

How Judge Schofield rules, drawn from 9 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Position
district
Appointed by
Barack Obama (Democratic)
Commissioned
2012-12-13
ABA rating
Unanimously Well Qualified
Education
Indiana University (B.A., 1977); New York University School of Law (J.D., 1981)
Signed orders read
9

How Judge Schofield decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Defers to a properly instructed jury: she denies Rule 59 motions for a new trial or to amend the judgment where the instructions correctly stated the law and adequate evidence supported the verdict.

“Because the jury was properly instructed, Defendant's motion for a new trial is denied.”

Procedural preferences

Resolves cross-motions for summary judgment issue by issue, commonly denying one side's motion while granting the other's in part and denying it in part, rather than a single blended ruling.

“For the reasons discussed below, Barclays' motion is denied, and Citibank's motion is granted in part and denied in part.”

Cautions

Enforces Article III standing on Rule 12(b)(1) motions: a plaintiff seeking only forward-looking injunctive relief who cannot show a real and immediate threat of future injury lacks standing, and the claim is dismissed.

“The City moves to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). For the following reasons, the motion is granted.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

An v. City of New York
230 F. Supp. 3d 224 · 2017-02-02
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“The City moves to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). For the following reasons, the motion is granted.”

Catlin Specialty Insurance v. QA3 Financial Corp.
36 F. Supp. 3d 336 · 2014-07-02
Motion for new trial (defendant) Denied

“Because the jury was properly instructed, Defendant's motion for a new trial is denied.”

Motion to alter or amend judgment (defendant) Denied

“QA3 also moves the Court to amend the judgment pursuant to Rule 59(e). For the following reasons, that motion is also denied.”

Citibank, N.A. v. Barclays Bank, PLC
28 F. Supp. 3d 174 · 2013-11-22
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“For the reasons discussed below, Barclays' motion is denied, and Citibank's motion is granted in part and denied in part.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted in part
Taylor v. Financial Recovery Services, Inc.
252 F. Supp. 3d 344 · 2017-05-18
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“The parties cross-move for summary judgment. For the following reasons, summary judgment is granted in Defendant's favor.”

Sarkissian Mason, Inc. v. Enterprise Holdings, Inc.
955 F. Supp. 2d 247 · 2013-07-15
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendant Enterprise moves for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the motion is GRANTED as to all counts, and the case is DISMISSED.”

Narragansett Electric Co. v. American Home Assurance Co.
999 F. Supp. 2d 511 · 2014-02-14
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted in part

“Plaintiffs and Century's respective motions to dismiss are granted in part and denied in part.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part
Lee v. Kucker & Bruh, LLP
958 F. Supp. 2d 524 · 2013-08-02
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“Defendants' motion is denied, and Plaintiffs motion is granted.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted
Ritchie Capital Management, L.L.C. v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.
532 B.R. 461 · 2014-11-10
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiffs now move to remand. For the reasons below, the motion is denied, and the case is transferred to the District of Minnesota.”

US Airways, Inc. v. Sabre Holdings Corp.
105 F. Supp. 3d 265 · 2015-01-06
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“Before the Court is Sabre's motion for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Sample of the judge's case assignments across two pages (a recent slice and an older, pre-2019 slice). She assumed senior status on 2025-01-01 and has a long terminated history (2013-2024), so the visible slices are partial and reflect sampled assignments, not a tenure-wide caseload census.

Draft for Judge Schofield with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Schofield, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Schofield's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace