John Mercer Walker Jr.

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York district Retired 1989 · served 1985–1989 Appointed by Ronald Reagan (Republican) 16 signed orders read

Judge Walker no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Walker decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In letter-of-credit disputes, he required prompt notice of documentary discrepancies and treated an unexplained nine-day delay as a waiver of the issuing bank's objections.

“In the absence of any persuasive and reasonable justification for the Bank’s 9 day delay following its examination of the documents, this Court concludes that the delay waived the issuing bank’s right to object to discrepancies between the LC and the relevant shipping documents.”

He enforced heightened fraud pleading by requiring substance and particularity rather than a longer complaint that merely repeated general allegations.

“the mere addition of paragraphs to a complaint, or pages to a memorandum, are no substitute for what Rule 9(b) and this Court require.”

Procedural preferences

He treated a reargument motion that merely repeated resolved arguments as a burden on both the opposing party and the court, and imposed Rule 11 sanctions.

“Plaintiff should not have to bear the burden of defending Peoples’ wholly vexatious motion to reargue, and the Court should not be burdened by such motions while meritorious matters await the Court’s attention.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Kuntal, S.A. v. Bank of New York
· 1989-01-13
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“Accordingly, the Court grants plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.”

Pashman v. Chemtex, Inc.
· 1987-02-23
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted.”

Motion for sanctions (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s motion for sanctions is denied.”

Two's Co. v. Transamerica Insurance
· 1986-10-01
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment is denied.”

Motion to disqualify counsel (defendant) Granted

“are disqualified from acting as counsel to Two’s Company for the duration of this lawsuit.”

Motion for sanctions (plaintiff) Denied

“Both parties’ motions for Rule 11 sanctions are denied.”

Motion for sanctions (defendant) Denied
SCAC Transport (USA) Inc. v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance
· 1987-01-15
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Atlantic’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.”

A/S D/S Svendborg v. United States
· 1986-10-15
Summary judgment (plaintiffs) Granted

“Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment under the Water Pollution Control Act is granted.”

Vekris v. Peoples Express Airlines, Inc.
· 1988-08-25
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment striking defendants’ defense of limited liability is granted.”

Summary judgment (defendants) Denied

“Defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment limiting defendants’ liability to $453.50 is denied.”

Summary judgment (defendants) Denied

“Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the ground that the paintings were not baggage is denied.”

Vekris v. Peoples Express Airlines, Inc.
· 1988-12-20
Motion for reargument (defendant) Denied

“Accordingly, defendant’s motion for rear-gument and permission to take an interlocutory appeal are denied.”

Motion for interlocutory appeal (defendant) Denied
Motion for sanctions (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiff’s request for the imposition of Rule 11 sanctions is granted.”

Frederick Music Co. v. Sickler
· 1989-03-16
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“Frederick Music’s motion for summary judgment and for an accounting is granted”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“SFM’s cross-motion for summary judgment is denied.”

Fischer v. Samuel Montagu, Inc.
· 1989-05-08
Motion for sanctions (plaintiff) Granted

“Accordingly, sanctions are imposed against defense counsel in an amount equal to the costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred in answering defendant’s counterclaim.”

Philan Insurance Ltd. v. Frank B. Hall & Co., Inc.
· 1989-04-17
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“For the reasons set forth above, the Court dismisses the Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6) and 9(b). The Court also grants plaintiffs leave to replead within twenty days.”

Boley v. Pineloch Associates, Ltd.
· 1988-07-15
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted in part

“Plaintiffs’ second cause of action is dismissed with prejudice because there is no private right of action under §§ 17(a)(2) and (3) of the Act. In addition, the remainder of the amended complaint alleging federal actions against the moving defendants is dismissed without prejudice to replead.”

Union-Appointed Trustees of the Tapers Industry Insurance & Annuity Funds v. Employer-Appointed Trustees of the Tapers Industry Insurance & Annuity Funds
· 1989-06-06
Motion to vacate arbitration award (Union-Appointed Trustees) Granted

“Accordingly, this Court grants Union-Appointed Trustee’s motion to vacate the Award”

A historical record

Judge Walker no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.