Cathy Seibel

How Judge Seibel rules, drawn from 20 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Position
district
Status
Senior status
Appointed by
George W. Bush (Republican)
Commissioned
2008-07-30
Education
Princeton University, A.B. (1982); Fordham University School of Law, J.D. (1985)
Signed orders read
20

How Judge Seibel decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A municipal failure-to-train claim must identify a concrete program deficiency and connect it causally to the alleged constitutional injury.

“Plaintiff must identify a specific deficiency in the village’s training program and establish that deficiency is closely related to the ultimate injury such that it actually caused the constitutional deprivation.”

Procedural preferences

She evaluates amendment requests for delay, bad faith, repeated pleading failures, prejudice, and futility while applying Rule 15's liberal standard.

“Leave to amend, though liberally granted, may properly be denied for: ‘undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of allowance of the amendment, futility of amendment, etc.’”

Cautions

A request to replead should explain how new allegations would cure the identified defect; a substantive deficiency makes amendment futile.

“the problem with her claims ‘is substantive[,] ... better pleading will not cure it,’ and ‘[r]epleading would thus be futile.’”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Barboza v. D'Agata
· 2015-09-10
Summary judgment (village defendants) Granted in part

“the village defendant’s motion is granted as to D’Agata and Gorr and denied as to the village.”

Summary judgment (defendant Zangala) Denied

“Zangala’s motion 4s denied.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted in part

“Plaintiffs motion is denied as to D’Aga-ta, Gorr and the village but granted as to Zangla. -”

Temple v. Hudson View Owners Corp.
· 2016-11-28
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“For the reasons stated above, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED.”

Hudson Energy Services, LLC v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. (In re Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.)
· 2015-09-24
Bankruptcy appeal (appellant) Denied

“For the reasons stated above, the Order of the Bankruptcy Court is AFFIRMED.”

Poughkeepsie Supermarket Corp. v. County of Dutchess
· 2015-10-15
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“For the reasons stated above, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint is GRANTED.”

Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. Wilson (In re Wilson)
· 2015-06-05
Bankruptcy appeal (appellant) Granted

“For the reasons stated above, the Bankruptcy Court’s Claim # 18 Order is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings.”

Bautista v. Cytosport, Inc.
· 2016-12-12
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“For the reasons stated above, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.”

Jackler v. Byrne
· 2010-02-11
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“For the reasons stated above, Defendants’ Motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the Complaint is dismissed in its entirety.”

Robinson v. Town of Kent
· 2011-12-29
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted in part

“For the foregoing reasons, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, and Plaintiffs Cross-Motion is GRANTED.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted
Gundlach v. IBM Japan Ltd.
· 2013-11-21
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“For the reasons stated above, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.”

Hardy v. Adam Rose Retirement Plan
· 2013-07-16
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Accordingly, Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and the case is dismissed.”

Summary judgment (defendants) Granted
United Veterans Memorial & Patriotic Ass'n v. City of New Rochelle
· 2014-12-22
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“For the reasons stated above, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint is GRANTED.”

McCrory v. Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency
· 2014-05-22
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is GRANTED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 170 days (N = 8).

Five of the eight sampled matters involved labor, employment, or disability-access claims; two were prisoner matters.

Draft for Judge Seibel with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Seibel, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Seibel's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace