Eric R. Komitee

How Judge Komitee rules, drawn from 7 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Appointed by
Donald Trump (Republican)
Commissioned
2019-12-05
Education
Emory University, B.A., 1992; New York University School of Law, J.D., 1995
Signed orders read
7

How Judge Komitee decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

He enforces release and contract language as written. An unambiguous general release of 'any and all' civil-rights claims accruing before its date bars later 1983 suits against covered officers/employees, and a plaintiff who failed to carve out a known, already-filed case (despite the form's invitation) is bound, with a 'without prejudice' notation not altering the result.

“Here, the release provision itself is unambiguous. ... Not only did the incidents at issue here occur prior to then, but Plaintiff filed this action in May of 2018, almost a year before signing the release.”

Where an express contract governs, he dismisses overlapping quasi-contract theories (unjust enrichment, implied covenant, quantum meruit) on summary judgment as duplicative, leaving only the breach-of-contract claim.

“the Defendant's motion for partial summary judgment is granted. Plaintiff's claims for unjust enrichment (count eight), breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing (count nine), and quantum meruit (count ten) are dismissed.”

Procedural preferences

On a TCPA motion to dismiss after Duguid, he holds that a short-code origin, generic and impersonal sales content, and defendant-owned links can support a reasonable inference of automated telephone dialing system use. The plaintiff need not negate alternative explanations at the pleading stage; those disputes are better resolved on summary judgment after discovery.

“The five text messages that Bank challenges here likewise give rise to a reasonable inference that DMS used an ATDS to contact him. ... while Duguid increases the burden on plaintiffs to prove a TCPA claim, some courts have held that determining whether a defendant used an ATDS is more appropriately determined on a summary judgment motion than a motion to dismiss.”

Cautions

He holds litigants (including pro se attorneys) to Rule 11's procedure: a sanctions request via informal letter, invoking Rule 11(c)(3) (which is the court's sua sponte mechanism) and without the 21-day safe-harbor service of a formal motion, will be denied as improper.

“Bank filed an informal letter motion and provided no notice to defense counsel. The motion is denied.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Soni v. Ameritas Life Insurance Corp.
1:21-cv-06272 · 2026-06-04
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Ameritas's motion for summary judgment, ECF Nos. 80, 91, is granted in its entirety.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Soni's cross-motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 75, is denied.”

Commercial Lubricants, LLC v. Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc.
1:14-cv-07483 · 2021-09-22
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, the Defendant's motion for partial summary judgment is granted. Plaintiff's claims for unjust enrichment (count eight), breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing (count nine), and quantum meruit (count ten) are dismissed.”

Bank v. Digital Media Solutions, Inc.
1:22-cv-00293 · 2023-02-03
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, DMS's motion to dismiss is denied.”

Motion for sanctions (plaintiff) Denied

“Bank filed an informal letter motion and provided no notice to defense counsel. The motion is denied.”

Reynolds v. Nazim
1:18-cv-02771 · 2021-03-12
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Officer Julia Nazim's motion for summary judgment is granted.”

Cannon v. Commissioner of Social Security
1:23-cv-06295 · 2026-07-02
Motion for attorneys fees (plaintiff) Granted

“plaintiff’s counsel’s motion for attorney’s fees is granted”

United States v. Merchant
1:24-cr-00362 · 2026-02-18
Motion in limine (government) Granted in part

“Motion to Protect Witness Identities. This motion is granted in part, as described below, largely for the reasons set out in the government’s motion and subsequent letters.”

Motion in limine (government) Granted

“For the reasons stated above and in the government’s briefing, this motion is granted.”

United States v. Aman
1:24-cr-00467 · 2026-06-23
Motion to seal (government) Granted in part

“The government’s request to file its Section 4 brief ex parte and under seal is granted. However, given the above discussion, the government is directed to file a redacted version of its Section 4 brief on the public docket by June 29, 2026.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 146 days (N = 15).

Median motion-to-ruling time: 153.5 days (N = 4).

An active Eastern District of New York judge. His civil docket is notably heavy on ADA public-accommodation suits (a high-volume, fast-settling category) and immigration mandamus (visa-delay suits), alongside insurance, Social Security, consumer-credit, bankruptcy appeals, copyright, and commercial contract cases, plus a criminal docket. The caseload mix is qualitative.

Draft for Judge Komitee with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Komitee, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Komitee's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace