Arlene R. Lindsay

How Judge Lindsay rules, drawn from 17 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Position
Magistrate judge
Commissioned
January 18, 1994
Education
University of Dayton, B.A., 1968; New York University School of Law, J.D., 1975
Signed orders read
17

About Judge Lindsay

Arlene R. Lindsay has served as a United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of New York since January 1994. Before joining the bench, she served as an Assistant United States Attorney and led the office’s Long Island Division.

Judge Lindsay's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Lindsay, as published on the court's website (checked October 8, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Filing

Provide courtesy copies of motions decided by Judge Lindsay when the motion, opposition, and reply are filed.

“Courtesy copies of all motion papers to be decided by Magistrate Judge Lindsay shall be provided to the Court upon filing of the motion, opposition, and reply briefs.”

Conferences

Request adjournments and extensions at least 48 hours before the appearance or deadline absent an emergency.

“All requests for adjournments or extensions of time shall be made at least 48 hours prior to the scheduled appearance or deadline, absent an emergency.”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026).

Key rules from these orders

How Judge Lindsay decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

In Sidik v. Royal Sovereign International, Inc., she recommended denying default judgment with leave to renew until the rights and liabilities of the nondefaulting defendants were determined.

“Judge Lindsay recommended that the Court deny the Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment with leave to renew, after a determination of the rights and liabilities of [the non-defaulting defendants].”

Cautions

In Gesualdi v. Deland Contracting, Inc., she recommended an itemized $307,977.91 award of unpaid ERISA contributions, interest, liquidated damages, fees, and costs after default; District Judge Hurley adopted the recommendation without objection.

“plaintiffs’ request for damages, costs, and fees is granted. The Court hereby directs that plaintiffs recover damages from defendant in the amount of $307,977.91”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Gesualdi v. Deland Contracting, Inc.
2:12-cv-04818 · 2014-09-17
Default judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“the 2014 Report and Recommendation is adopted as if set forth herein, and plaintiffs’ request for damages, costs, and fees is granted. The Court hereby directs that plaintiffs recover damages from defendant in the amount of $307,977.91”

Gesualdi v. Bestech Transport, LLC
2:14-cv-01110 · 2015-03-18
Default judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“Judge Lindsay’s R&R (Docket Entry 21) is ADOPTED in its entirety and Plaintiffs’ motion for a default judgment (Docket Entry 10) is GRANTED.”

Sidik v. Royal Sovereign International, Inc.
2:17-cv-07020 · 2020-09-08
Default judgment (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“Judge Lindsay recommended that the Court deny the Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment with leave to renew, after a determination of the rights and liabilities of Royal Sovereign International, Inc., Royal Centurian Inc., and BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc.. ... Accordingly, the R&R is adopted in its entirety.”

Petterson v. State University of New York at Stony Brook
2:15-cv-01228 · 2017-11-15
Motion for leave to amend (plaintiff) Granted in part

“the plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint is denied insofar as it seeks to add the third cause of action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and granted to the extent that plaintiff is permitted to amend the complaint to add paragraphs 9, 91, and 94.”

EEOC v. A & F Fire Protection Co., Inc.
2:17-cv-04745 · 2019-02-07
Motions to strike (plaintiff) Denied

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to strike is denied in its entirety.”

Booker v. Department of Social Services
2:23-cv-04888 · 2026-02-25
Judgment on the pleadings (defendant) Granted

“Accordingly, the Court grants Long Beach's motion to dismiss without prejudice. Booker may amend her complaint as against Long Beach within thirty days of this Order but only if she is able to address the deficiencies outlined in this decision.”

Schneider v. Long Island Rail Road Company
2:23-cv-03707 · 2026-02-25
Summary judgment (third-party defendant) Granted

“Because there is no dispute that written notice of the defect allegedly responsible for Plaintiff's injury was not provided to the TOOB, and there is no proof offered that the TOOB created the defect through an affirmative act of negligence, or the defect resulted from a special use of the property by the TOOB, the TOOB's motion for summary judgment is granted.”

Arch Specialty Insurance Company v. Lyter Group, Inc.
2:23-cv-08146 · 2025-05-02
Default judgment (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“Accordingly, the undersigned recommends that the instant motion be denied with leave to renew along with proof that all documents in support of the request for default judgment, including the Clerk’s Certificate of Default and any papers required by the rule, have been personally served on, or mailed to the last known business address of Lyter.”

Cassese v. Washington Mutual, Inc.
2:05-cv-02724 · 2007-05-07
Motions to compel (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“Accordingly, to the extent the plaintiff is seeking information regarding class-wide damages, the motion is denied, with leave to renew once the motion for class certification is decided.”

Burris v. Nassau County
2:11-cv-00119 · 2012-02-14
Motion for sanctions (plaintiff) Denied

“The motion for contempt, sanctions and costs is denied. Plaintiff’s motion is granted to the extent it seeks to conduct the depositions by a date certain.”

Motions to compel (plaintiff) Granted
Panzica v. Mas-Maz, Inc.
2:05-cv-02595 · 2007-06-11
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“For the reasons set forth above, the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied and the defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted
Sapienza v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
2:09-cv-01224 · 2012-05-31
Motions to compel (defendant) Granted in part

“Before the court is the defendant’s motion to compel the plaintiff to produce expert reports from his treating physicians and the plaintiff’s opposition to the motion. For the reasons that are set forth below, the motion is denied in part and granted in part.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

  • An Eastern District of New York referral magistrate in Central Islip on Long Island.
  • A sample of her currently assigned (pending) dockets shows a Long Island civil referral mix: mortgage foreclosure and commercial contract, product-liability tort, FLSA labor, civil-rights employment and ADA, truth-in-lending, immigration, and criminal duty-magistrate matters.
  • Consistent with the sampled recommendations, her substantive referral work runs heavily to default-judgment and benefit-fund cases alongside general Long Island civil matters.
  • This is a current-snapshot composition, not a full-tenure caseload.

Pending matters in the official report

Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years3
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 202603
Sep 202503
Mar 202504
Sep 202405
Mar 202408
Sep 2023011
Mar 202308
Sep 202208
Mar 202229
Sep 202104
Mar 202104
Sep 202003

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

How long civil cases take in this court

For the whole of U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, not for Judge Lindsay: median time from filing to disposition of the civil cases the court closed in the 12 months ending September 30, 2025, as reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

CasesMedian time
All civil cases closed7,3926.7 months
Closed with no court action1,4853 months
Closed before pretrial5,0226.9 months
Closed during or after pretrial83513.9 months
Closed during trial5049.6 months
12 months endingCases closedMedian time
Sep 20257,3926.7 months
Sep 20247,8795.8 months
Sep 20237,7465.1 months
Sep 20227,5886.2 months
Sep 20216,7097.9 months
Sep 20206,0628.6 months
Sep 20196,8588.1 months

The table leaves out prisoner petitions, land condemnations, deportation reviews, recovery of overpayments and enforcement of judgments, and reports no median for fewer than 10 cases. A district that closed a large multidistrict litigation in the period shows very large counts and long medians for that year. Source: Table C-5, U.S. District Courts (spreadsheet).

Draft for Judge Lindsay with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Lindsay, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Lindsay's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace