Martha Vazquez

“Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint [Doc. 13] is GRANTED, as follows: the Sernas' federal due process claim is dismissed with prejudice; and the Sernas' state law claims are dismissed without prejudice.”

“Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment for Recovery of Fraudulent Transfer of Property [Doc. 24] is DENIED.”

“Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment on Limitations Grounds [Doc. 20] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as follows: judgment as a matter of law is granted in Church Mutual's favor as to Second Presbyterian's breach of contract claim (Count I); Second Presbyterian's NMUICPA claim (Count II) and Second Presbyterian's bad faith claim (Count III) remain viable.”

“Plaintiff's Motion for Certification of Question of Law to the New Mexico Supreme Court [Doc. 30] is DENIED.”

“Defendant Lixin Zhang's Letter Motion for Relief from Judgment [Doc. 42] ... will be DENIED.”

“Respondents File it as a Motion to Dismiss and Newly Discovered Evidence That to Plaintiff [Doc. 45] will be DENIED.”

“Debt Pay, Inc's Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint [Doc. 41] is GRANTED, as follows: the Second Amended Complaint is dismissed as to Debt Pay Pro.”

“Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. 15) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and the case is hereby REMANDED to the First Judicial District Court of New Mexico”

“Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Second and Third Counts of Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 6) ... are DENIED AS MOOT.”

“Plaintiffs' Motion to Sever and Remand Claims Arising Under the New Mexico Civil Rights Act and New Mexico Tort Claims Act [Doc. 17] is DENIED.”

“the Motion to Remand and for Costs and Memorandum in Support, filed September 21, 2015, [Doc. 8], is granted. This matter is remanded to the First Judicial District Court of New Mexico.”

“Because this Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction, it will not consider Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceeding, [Doc. 4].”

“Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. 4) is DENIED.”

“Defendant's motion to exclude expert testimony on fingerprint evidence is DENIED.”

“the Court concludes that Defendant is entitled to qualified immunity on Plaintiff's excessive force claim.”

“Plaintiff failed to meet his burden of showing that he is entitled to summary judgment on the excessive force claim.”

“the Court will grant Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Timely Name Fictitious Defendants in part and dismiss the three remaining John/Jane Doe defendants.”

“Armijo's Motion for Summary Judgment now before the Court will be denied without prejudice.”

“GRANT Plaintiffs' Motion to Substitute Jose Carrasco for John Doe Officer and Dismiss Defendants Jojola and Napoleone.”

“the Court finds that, under Toombs, a technical violation of the Speedy Trial Act occurred as outlined above, and that dismissal of the indictment is warranted on that basis ... dismissal will be without prejudice.”