Margaret I. Strickland

United States District Court for the District of New Mexico district Appointed by Joseph R. Biden (Democratic) 22 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Jaramillo v. Taos County Board of Commissioners
1:21-cv-01119-MIS-KK
Attorney fees (defendant) Denied

“Defendant Hogrefe's Application for Award of Attorney's Fees, ECF No. 47, is hereby DENIED.”

Cruz v. City of Deming
2:22-cv-00957-MIS-GJF
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the Deming Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on Counts I, II, III and VI of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 59) is GRANTED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Moot / procedural

“Defendants Luna County and Lieutenant Arturo Baeza's Motion and Memorandum in Support of Summary Judgment and Qualified Immunity against Counts II, III, and VI (ECF No. 25) is DENIED AS MOOT;”

Spann v. New Mexico Board of Bar Examiners
1:21-cv-00709-MIS-SCY
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“The Motion by the NMBBE-Related Defendants for Summary Judgment as to Second Cause of Action, ECF No. 100, is GRANTED;”

Motion to amend (plaintiff) Granted in part

“Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Fourth Amended Complaint, ECF No. 157, is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART ... The Fourth Amended Complaint shall contain ONLY Count III - Violation of Title III of the ADA against ONLY Defendant NMBBE”

Springer v. Seventh Judicial District Court
1:23-cv-00499-MIS-JMR
Sua sponte dismissal (court) Granted

“Counts I, II, and III are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE to the extent they seek (1) injunctive relief and (2) a declaratory judgment regarding past liability; Counts I, II, and III are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the extent they seek prospective declaratory relief ... Count IV is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Moot / procedural

“Defendants Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint ... ECF No. 105, is DENIED AS MOOT;”

Ortiz y Pino v. Toulouse Oliver
1:24-cv-00240-MIS-JFR · 2024-10-28
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Granted in part

“Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART consistent with this Order; Secretary Toulouse Oliver is ENJOINED from enforcing the de facto ban on charitable donations to individuals under Section 1-19-29.1(A)(4).”

Ortiz y Pino v. Toulouse Oliver
1:24-cv-00240-MIS-JFR · 2025-01-17
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Secretary Toulouse Oliver's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED;”

Permanent injunction (plaintiff) Denied

“Senator Ortiz y Pino's Motion for Permanent Injunction and Declaratory Judgment is DENIED;”

Irby v. Jefferson Insurance Company
2:24-cv-00094-MIS-JHR · 2024-07-01
Judgment on the pleadings (defendant) Denied

“Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss per Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), which the Court construes as a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, is DENIED.”

Singer v. United States of America
1:20-cv-00972-MIS-JFR · 2022-09-02
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendant United States of America's Motion to Dismiss a Claim for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support (ECF No. 55) is DENIED.”

Moreno v. Devon Energy Corporation
1:22-cv-00345-MIS-JHR · 2022-08-17
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant Devon Energy Corporation's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (ECF No. 9) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Devon Energy Corporation are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

United States v. Theodore Ian Chavez, IV
2:23-cr-01679-MIS-DLM · 2024-02-07
Motion to suppress (defendant) Denied

“Defendant Theodore Ian Chavez, IV's Motion to Suppress Statements, ECF No. 39, is DENIED.”

Sellers v. Humana Insurance Company
1:24-cv-00162-MIS-GBW · 2024-12-20
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendant Humana's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 40, is hereby DENIED.”

United States v. Juan Gomez Montiel
2:25-cr-05041-MIS · 2026-04-10
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Mandatory Minimum Allegation is DENIED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 335 days (N = 14).

Median motion-to-ruling time: 113 days (N = 1).

Judge Strickland sits in the Las Cruces division. The sampled caseload combines illegal-reentry, drug, and firearms prosecutions with civil-rights cases involving local law enforcement, prisoner civil-rights actions, removed personal-injury matters, employment discrimination, insurance, TCPA, and federal tax disputes. Magistrate judges frequently handle material-witness and preliminary matters in the criminal cases. This describes caseload composition, not motion outcomes.

Put Judge Strickland's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Strickland actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Strickland's own signed orders and cites them.