Kevin R. Sweazea

“the magistrate judge recommended that Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order (Doc. 3) be denied. ... 2. Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order (Doc. 3) is DENIED”

“Judge Sweazea recommended that the Court deny Mr. Martin's motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. 18) without prejudice; grant Mr. Martin's motion for partial dismissal (Doc. 16) ... Mr. Martin's motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. 18) is DENIED”

“the Honorable Kevin R. Sweazea, United States Magistrate Judge ... recommends dismissal with prejudice of the petition for writ of habeas corpus that Petitioner Santana Serrano filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. ... The Court will overrule Serrano's Objections, adopt the PFRD, dismiss ... [the] Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 ... with prejudice, and deny the certificate of appealability.”

“Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the Commissioner’s decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of the Commissioner’s request for remand of this action for further proceedings, this Court hereby REVERSES the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with a REMAND to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings.”

“Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the Commissioner’s decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of the Commissioner’s request for remand of this action for further proceedings, this Court hereby REVERSES the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with a REMAND to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings as set forth above.”

“With the consent of the parties to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(c); FED. R. CIV. P. 73(b), the Court has considered the parties’ filings and has thoroughly reviewed the administrative record. Having done so, the Court concludes that the ALJ erred in his decision and will therefore GRANT Plaintiff’s motion. ... Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion to Reverse and Remand for a Rehearing (Doc. 19) is GRANTED, and the Court remands this case back to the SSA for proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

“With the consent of the parties to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(c); FED. R. CIV. P. 73(b), the Court has considered the parties’ filings and has thoroughly reviewed the administrative record. Having done so, the Court concludes that the Commissioner erred in his decision and will therefore GRANT Plaintiff’s motion. ... Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion to Reverse and Award Benefits, or for Rehearing (Doc. 20) is GRANTED, and the Court remands this case back to the SSA for proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

“With the consent of the parties to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(c); FED. R. CIV. P. 73(b), the Court has considered the parties’ filings and has thoroughly reviewed the administrative record. Having done so, the Court concludes that the ALJ erred in his decision and will therefore GRANT Benally’s motion and remand this case back to the SSA for proceedings consistent with this opinion. ... Accordingly, Benally’s Motion to Reverse and/or Remand (Doc. 24) is GRANTED, and the Court remands this case back to the SSA for proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

“With the consent of the parties to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(c); FED. R. CIV. P. 73(b), the Court has considered the parties’ filings and has thoroughly reviewed the administrative record. Having done so, the Court concludes that the ALJ erred in his decision and will therefore GRANT Plaintiff’s Motion and remand this case back to the SSA for proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

“Plaintiff Victoria A. E.'s Motion for Reversal and Remand to the Social Security Administration, (Doc. 14), is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commissioner's final decision is REVERSED and this matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order.”

“the Court finds that the settlement is fair, reasonable, and in the minor Plaintiff's best interests ... The Joint Motion to Approve Minor Settlement (Doc. 25) be granted.”

“the amended proofs of service fail to establish service was effected. Accordingly, the Motion (Doc. 39) is GRANTED.”

“the undersigned further RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Todd Danley, Deanna Preston, Brendan Rodella, and Bryce Bailey be dismissed without prejudice.”