Jerry H. Ritter, Jr.

How Judge Ritter rules, drawn from 17 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the District of New Mexico
Position
magistrate
Commissioned
2017-09-05
Signed orders read
17

How Judge Ritter decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

When a pro se plaintiff stopped prosecuting surviving claims, Judge Ritter issued an order to show cause and then recommended dismissal with prejudice under Rule 41(b).

“Judge Ritter ... recommends that the Court dismiss this case, because it appears that Plaintiff Leland T. Taylor either is unwilling or unable to prosecute his surviving claims.”

In one state-prisoner habeas matter, Judge Ritter addressed the double-jeopardy and ineffective-assistance claims and recommended dismissal with prejudice; the district judge adopted the recommendation and denied a certificate of appealability.

“Judge Ritter recommends that the Court dismiss Petitioner Eric Gutierrez's amended habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. 2254 with prejudice.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Taylor v. Lujan Grisham et al.
1:20-cv-00267-JB-JHR
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“The Honorable Jerry H. Ritter, United States Magistrate Judge ... recommends that the Court deny Defendant Michelle Lujan Grisham's Motion for Summary Judgment No. I: Dismissal Based on Lack Of Personal Participation ... IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Michelle Lujan Grisham's Motion for Summary Judgment No. I ... is denied.”

Taylor v. Lujan Grisham
1:20-cv-00267-JB-JHR
Involuntary dismissal (court) Granted

“Judge Ritter ... recommends that the Court dismiss this case, because it appears that Plaintiff Leland T. Taylor either is unwilling or unable to prosecute his surviving claims. ... this case is dismissed with prejudice, because it appears that Plaintiff Leland T. Taylor is either unwilling or unable to prosecute his surviving claims”

Gutierrez v. Balderas
2:19-cv-00436-RB-JHR
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“After analyzing the double jeopardy and the right to effective assistance of counsel claims, Judge Ritter recommends that the Court dismiss Petitioner Eric Gutierrez's amended habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. 2254 with prejudice. ... the Court ... DISMISSES with prejudice Gutierrez's amended 2254 petition ... [and] DENIES issuing a certificate of appealability”

Cordova v. United States
2:22-cv-00479-JB-JHR
Motions to strike (respondent) Granted

“the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in Favor of Granting the Motion to Strike ... In the PFRD, the Honorable Jerry H. Ritter ... recommends that the Court grant the Motion and Strike. ... the United States' Motion to Strike Defendant's Amended Motion to Vacate Under 28 U.S.C. 2255 ... is granted; ... [the] Amended Motion to Vacate ... is stricken”

Jose A T. Jr. v. Leland Dudek, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
1:24-cv-00246
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to remand and REMANDS the matter for further proceedings.”

Gutierrez v. Doña Ana County Board of Commissioners
2:24-cv-00428
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint [Doc. 13] is GRANTED”

Gutierrez v. Doña Ana County Board of Commissioners
2:24-cv-00428
Voluntary dismissal (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“shall be and hereby are dismissed with prejudice with each party to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees.”

National Indemnity Company v. Gutierrez
1:24-cv-00226
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“I recommend the Court GRANT National Indemnity's Motion for Default and Summary Judgment [Doc. 14], ENTER default judgment and summary judgment in favor of National Indemnity”

Rawson Inc. v. Associated Materials, LLC
2:24-cv-01012
Motion to transfer venue (defendant) Denied

“Associated Material's Motion to Transfer Venue [Doc. 22] is hereby DENIED.”

Rawson Inc. v. Associated Materials, LLC
2:24-cv-01012
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Associated Materials' Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim [Doc. 21] is DENIED.”

Duron v. Pilot Corporation
2:24-cv-01004
Motion for extension of time (plaintiff) Denied

“Duron's Opposed Motion to Extend Deadlines [Doc. 35] is hereby DENIED.”

Montoya v. New Mexico Corrections Department
1:22-cv-00265
Motion for extension of time (plaintiff) Denied

“Montoya's motion to extend the scheduling order's deadlines is DENIED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 444.5 days (N = 10).

By party consent, Judge Ritter enters final decisions in a steady stream of Social Security disability appeals under Titles II and XVI. He also writes recommendations in pro se habeas and civil-rights cases. This describes the composition of his work, not a grant rate.

Draft for Judge Ritter with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Ritter, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Ritter's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace