Randy D. Doub

How Judge Doub rules, drawn from 20 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Doub no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Position
bankruptcy
Status
Deceased
Education
East Carolina University, B.A., political science, magna cum laude, 1977; University of North Carolina School of Law, J.D., 1980
Signed orders read
20

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Beaman v. Head (In re Head Grading Co.)
· 2006-09-15
Summary judgment (Stephen L. Beaman, Chapter 7 trustee) Granted

“Accordingly, Mr. Beaman’s motion for summary judgment is ALLOWED.”

In re Jackson
· 2006-09-15

Retained outside statistics because the order directed amended motions and corrected double-counted business expenses without finally confirming or denying a plan.

In re Sledge
· 2006-10-11
Motion to disgorge attorney fees (Debtors) Granted

“Mr. Gemborys is ordered to reimburse Mr. and Mrs. Sledge in the amount of $2500.00 for fees paid.”

Request for attorney fees and costs (John Bircher, counsel for debtors) Granted

“After reviewing the application, the court orders Mr. Gemborys to pay Mr. Bircher $9,662.45 in fees and $1,169.95 in expenses, for a total of $10,832.40, which represents Mr. Bircher’s reasonable fees and expenses in the pursuit of this matter.”

Peavey v. Bradley (In re Heritage Medical Associates, P.A.)
· 2007-01-09
Motion to disqualify trustee (Defendants) Denied

“After hearing the arguments of counsel and reviewing the emails submitted by the defendants, the defendant’s motion to disqualify Mr. Peavey as trustee in this action is DENIED.”

In re Howard
· 2007-01-25
Motion for credit counseling exemption (Randolph Thomas Howard and spouse) Granted

“Therefore, the debtors’ motion to exempt Mr. Howard from the pre-petition credit counseling requirement is ALLOWED.”

In re Male
· 2007-01-25
Motion to determine valuation and claim status (Debtors) Moot / procedural

“The court denies the motion as moot, as the preclusive effect of confirmation established the claim as unsecured.”

Motion to avoid judicial lien (Debtors) Granted

“Based on the foregoing, the court grants the debtors’ motion to avoid the judgment lien of Christina James”

Motion to amend schedules for exemption (Debtors) Granted

“The court grants the debtors’ motion to amend their schedules in order to claim an exemption of $20,000.00 in their real property”

In re Bennett
· 2007-02-01
Motion for relief from automatic stay (Columbia University) Granted

“Based on the foregoing, the motion of Columbia for lifting the automatic stay and for the retroactive annulment of the automatic stay is ALLOWED.”

Request for sanctions (Debtor) Moot / procedural

“As a result, the debtor’s motion for sanctions for willful violation of the automatic stay is moot and therefore is DISMISSED.”

In re Williams
· 2007-02-09
Sua sponte case dismissal (Court) Granted

“Based on the foregoing, the debtor’s case is DISMISSED for failure to comply with the requirements of § 109(h).”

Zeitchik v. Zeitchik (In re Zeitchik)
· 2007-06-15
Dischargeability complaint (Esther P. Zeitchik) Granted in part

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Mr. Zeitchik’s obligation to Ms. Zeitchik in the amount of $2,300.00 per month in alimony, totaling $39,100.00 through January 15, 2007, is NONDISCHARGEABLE. Mr. Zeitchik’s obligation to Ms. Zeitchik in the amount of $145,000.00, with a total due and owing of $99,888.64; and the obligation to make mortgage payments in the amount of $1,884.82 per month, with a total due and owing of $42,235.68 as of January 7, 2007, plus $1,884.82 per month thereafter until the mortgage is paid in full, are DISCHARGEABLE pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(15).”

In re Lanier
· 2008-02-29
Motion to approve compromise (Chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“Based on the foregoing, the court finds that this motion to approve compromise is not in the best interests of the estate or in the best interests of the creditors, and therefore the motion is DENIED.”

In re Radco Properties, Inc.
· 2009-03-09
Motion to confirm chapter 11 plan (RADCO Properties, Inc.) Denied

“ORDER DENYING CONFIRMATION OF CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION”

Motion to approve disclosure statement (RADCO Properties, Inc.) Denied

“Accordingly, the Court finds that the Second Disclosure Statement does not contain adequate information and approval of the Second Disclosure Statement is DENIED.”

In re Hoff
· 2009-03-23
Motion to excuse schedule filing (Debtors) Granted

“Based on the foregoing, the debtors’ motion to excuse the filing of Schedule I is ALLOWED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

All five sampled matters were terminated, but every retained entry stream was empty.

A historical record

Judge Doub no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.