Timothy Spafard Hillman

How Judge Hillman rules, drawn from 20 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Hillman no longer sits on this court. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Position
District judge
Status
Retired 2024
Served
2012–2024
Appointed by
Barack Obama (Democratic)
Commissioned
June 6, 2012
Education
Coe College, B.A., 1970; Suffolk University Law School, J.D., 1973
Signed orders read
20

About Judge Hillman

Timothy Spafard Hillman was a judge of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Appointed by President Barack Obama, Judge Hillman received a commission on June 6, 2012. Judge Hillman assumed senior status on July 1, 2022 and retired on July 25, 2024.

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Ramirez v. City of Worcester
Motions to strike (defendants) Denied

“Therefore, the Defendants’ motion to strike is denied. Defendants’ motion for a more definite statement is granted.”

Motion for more definite statement (defendants) Granted
Young v. Aetna Life Insurance
Motion to exclude documents from record (plaintiff) Denied

“For the reasons set forth above, Plaintiffs motion to exclude documents from the record (Docket No. 23) is denied.”

Pare ex rel. Springer Farm Trust v. Northborough Capital Partners, LLC
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Docket No. 12) is denied without prejudice.”

United States v. Therrien
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“For the reasons set forth above, the Defendant’s motion to dismiss is denied without prejudice.”

Pazol v. Tough Mudder Inc.
Motion to dismiss and compel arbitration (defendant) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Compel Mediation and Arbitration (Docket No. 14) is granted.”

Motion to strike affidavit (plaintiffs) Denied

“Therefore, the Court finds that the Participant Agreement submitted by Defendants governs this dispute, and denies Plaintiff's Motion to Strike the Affidavit of Lucas Barclay (Docket No. 33).”

United States v. Sliwa
Motion for franks hearing and to suppress (defendant) Denied

“For the above reasons, the defendant’s motion is denied.”

Metcalf v. Bay Ferries Ltd.
Motion to enforce settlement (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s Motion To Enforce Settlement Agreement (Docket No. 128) is denied;”

Motion to vacate dismissal (plaintiffs) Granted

“Plaintiffs Motion To Vacate Settlement Order Of Dismissal [Doc. # 123] (Docket No. 135) is allowed.”

Saad v. American Diabetes Association
Motion for judgment on pleadings (defendant) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket No. 18) is granted.”

Boguslav v. BLB Trading, LLC
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“The Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 9) is granted and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File an Affidavit (Docket No. 21) is denied as moot;”

Motion for leave to file affidavit (plaintiffs) Moot / procedural
Bernier v. Colvin
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“For these reasons,. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Docket No. 12) is granted, and Plaintiffs complaint is hereby dismissed.”

Solmetex, LLC v. Apavia LLC
Motions to dismiss (Apavia) Denied

“For the reasons set forth above, Apa-via’s motion to dismiss (Docket’ No. 39) is denied.”

United States v. McForbes
Motion to amend (defendant) Granted

“For the reasons set forth above, Defendant’s motion to amend (Docket- No. 188) granted, and his motion for new trial (Docket No. 183) is denied.”

Motion for new trial (defendant) Denied

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 294 days (N = 20).

Median motion-to-ruling time: 88.5 days (N = 10).

The 20 located post-commission cases were all closed and included contract, statutory, personal-injury, civil-rights, tax, bankruptcy, employment, habeas, benefits, and negotiable-instrument matters.

Pending matters in the official report

Judge Hillman was last listed in the Civil Justice Reform Act report as of March 31, 2025.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years0
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 202500
Sep 202400
Mar 202400
Sep 202303
Mar 2023010
Sep 2022215
Mar 2022011
Sep 2021016
Mar 202107
Sep 202005

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

A historical record

Judge Hillman no longer sits on this court. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.