Mark Gerald Mastroianni

How Judge Mastroianni rules, drawn from 35 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Position
District judge
Appointed by
Barack Obama (Democratic)
Commissioned
June 5, 2014
ABA rating
Well Qualified
Education
American International College (B.A., magna cum laude, 1986); Western New England College School of Law (J.D., 1989)
Signed orders read
35

About Judge Mastroianni

Mark Gerald Mastroianni is a judge of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Appointed by President Barack Obama, Judge Mastroianni received a commission on June 5, 2014.

Judge Mastroianni's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Mastroianni, as published on the court's website (checked October 9, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Filing

File any confidentiality agreement covering discovery with the court.

“Parties executing confidentiality agreements that cover discovery practice shall file copies of such agreements with the court.”

Motions

Submit an appropriate proposed default-judgment form with a motion for default judgment.

“The moving party shall also submit an appropriate form of default judgment”

Trial

Move for a jury questionnaire by the motions in limine deadline.

“Attorneys wishing for the court to use a jury questionnaire should file a motion with their request no later than the deadline for filing motions in limine.”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 9, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Mastroianni decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

In LaRoe, he adopted a dismissal sanction after repeated refusal to comply with discovery orders prevented the remaining retaliation claim from reaching a merits judgment.

“While dismissal is a severe sanction, a party’s repeated refusal to cooperate in discovery creates a roadblock that prevents the court from reaching a final judgment on the merits.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Barr Inc. v. Studio One, Inc.
· 2015-11-18
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 15) is DENIED in its entirety.”

Rivera v. U.S. Tsubaki, Inc.
· 2015-02-05
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is hereby DENIED.”

O'Rourke v. Hampshire Council of Governments
· 2015-08-07
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“the court ALLOWS Defendant’s motion to dismiss this claim without prejudice”

Oberther v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
· 2014-09-15
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“the court will grant Defendants’ motion in part and deny it in part.”

Peter Pan Bus Lines, Inc. v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
· 2016-05-17
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“the court ALLOWS Greyhound’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 12) to the extent it seeks dismissal of the web commission claims in Counts I, II, and III which are predicated on the 2008 Agreement.”

Hoostein v. Mental Health Ass'n
· 2015-04-13
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendants’ motions for dismissal (Dkt. Nos. 12, 25) are GRANTED.”

S.S. ex rel. S.Y. v. City of Springfield
· 2015-11-19
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“the court DENIES Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss as to the claims against Defendants City of Springfield and Springfield Public Schools and ALLOWS the motion as to the claims against Defendants Domenic Samo and Daniel J. Warwick.”

McKee v. Cosby
· 2017-02-16
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the court ALLOWS Defendant’s motion to dismiss.”

AIG Property Casualty Co. v. Green
· 2016-11-08
Judgment on the pleadings (defendant) Granted in part

“the court ALLOWS Cosby’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, in part, insofar as it seeks a judgment that AIG owes Cosby a duty to defend.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“The court also DENIES AIG’s Motion for Summary Judgment”

Sullivan v. Bank of New York Mellon Corp.
· 2015-03-19
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“the court will grant Defendants’ motion in part and deny it in part.”

Mary G-N v. City of Northampton
· 2014-11-20
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is hereby DENIED.”

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Maxim Power Corp.
· 2016-07-21
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Respondents’ motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 16) is DENIED in its entirety.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The post-appointment sample is dominated by civil-rights and employment matters, consistent with a Western Division docket; the enumeration also includes a substantial criminal caseload not reflected in this civil duration slice.

Pending matters in the official report

Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.

Motions pending more than six months7
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months5
Civil cases pending more than three years10
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 2026710
Sep 202597
Mar 202598
Sep 2024711
Mar 2024520
Sep 2023526
Mar 2023824
Sep 20221820
Mar 2022615
Sep 2021612
Mar 20213011
Sep 2020379

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

How long civil cases take in this court

For the whole of U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, not for Judge Mastroianni: median time from filing to disposition of the civil cases the court closed in the 12 months ending September 30, 2025, as reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

CasesMedian time
All civil cases closed2,6827.3 months
Closed with no court action1,0953.8 months
Closed before pretrial8817.1 months
Closed during or after pretrial67617.4 months
Closed during trial3034.8 months
12 months endingCases closedMedian time
Sep 20252,6827.3 months
Sep 20242,4397.2 months
Sep 20232,7569.1 months
Sep 20222,22210.2 months
Sep 20212,58212.2 months
Sep 20202,39111.2 months
Sep 20194,43823 months

The table leaves out prisoner petitions, land condemnations, deportation reviews, recovery of overpayments and enforcement of judgments, and reports no median for fewer than 10 cases. A district that closed a large multidistrict litigation in the period shows very large counts and long medians for that year. Source: Table C-5, U.S. District Courts (spreadsheet).

Draft for Judge Mastroianni with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Mastroianni, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Mastroianni's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace