John Joseph McNaught

United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts district Retired 1991 · served 1979–1991 Appointed by Jimmy Carter (Democratic) 20 signed orders read

Judge McNaught no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Manufacturers Hanover International Banking Corp. v. SPRING TREE CORPORATION
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on Counts I and II of the Complaint is granted”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“the defendant’s motions, are hereby denied.”

Commissioner v. Adcom, Inc. (In Re Adcom, Inc.)
Bankruptcy appeal (Commissioner of Revenue) Granted

“It is hereby ordered that the Commissioner of Revenue, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, is entitled to post-petition interest at the rate provided by G.L. c. 62C, § 32 with respect to the unsecured priority tax claim against the Debtor’s estate.”

English v. Hartford
Summary judgment (third-party defendant Scott) Granted

“The motion for summary judgment is granted.”

Employers Insurance v. Commercial Union Insurance
Motions to transfer (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s motion is granted.”

AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO, BOSTON METRO AREA v. Frank
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Denied

“Where I conclude that plaintiff does not have a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits, plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction is denied.”

Stuart v. Roache
Preliminary injunction (plaintiffs) Denied

“Since this Court is satisfied that the plaintiffs have not shown a likelihood of succeeding on the merits, the injunctive relief which has been requested is hereby denied.”

Motion to intervene (MAMLEO) Granted

“I am allowing a motion brought by the Massachusetts Association of Minority Law Enforcement Officers (MAMLEO), successor in interest to the Massachusetts Association of Afro-American Police, Inc. (MAAAP), to intervene as a party defendant.”

Motions to dismiss (defendant Haley) Moot / procedural

“The motion to dismiss for failure to join an indispensable party brought by defendant Haley is moot.”

Arkwright Mutual Insurance v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
Summary judgment (defendant Pan American World Airways) Granted

“Plaintiff’s claim must, therefore, fail and defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted.”

John & Kostas Service Station, Inc. v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.
Summary judgment (defendant Cumberland Farms) Denied

“Whether Cumberland has acted with ‘evil motive’ raises a genuine issue of material fact which must be determined by a jury. Summary judgment is denied.”

North American Directory Corp. v. Amcan Enterprises, Inc.
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Denied

“Accordingly, the request for preliminary injunctive relief is denied.”

S & B Luftracht Transporte GmbH v. American Customs Brokers, Inc.
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted in part

“Plaintiff’s motion, therefore, is granted as to Callery and denied as to American and Ross.”

United States Ex Rel. Tonawanda Tank Transport Service, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty Insurance
Summary judgment (defendants Praught and Hartford) Granted

“Praught and Hartford’s motion for summary judgment. The primary issue is whether Tonawanda’s contractual relationship with Praught eliminated the notice requirements under the Miller Act. Section 270b(a) of that Act states: ‘[A]ny person having direct contractual relationship with a subcontractor but no contractual relationship express or implied with the contractor furnishing said payment bond shall have a right of action upon the said payment bond upon giving written notice to said contractor ... stating with substantial accuracy the amount claimed and the name of the party to whom the material was furnished or supplied....’ Defendants’ motion is granted.”

Cohen v. Steve's Ice Cream
Summary judgment (third-party defendant) Granted

“Motion for summary judgment is allowed. Judgment for the third party defendant on the third party complaint.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 1816 days (N = 20).

The twenty located historical dockets were all terminated and spanned securities, civil-rights, contract, maritime, labor, product-liability, medical-malpractice, and related matters. This is a partial historical slice rather than a complete caseload.

A historical record

Judge McNaught no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.