David H. Hennessy

U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts Appointed by Judges of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts 28 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Dunfee v. Barry
4:17-cv-40108-DHH · 2018-09-24
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“I hereby ALLOW the motion for summary judgment (Docket #12) and DENY the motion to amend (Docket #18).”

Motion for leave to amend (plaintiff) Denied

“the motion to amend is properly denied as futile.”

Murphy v. Massachusetts Department of Developmental Services
3:13-cv-12839-MAP · 2014-12-04
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“the court hereby ADOPTS Judge Hennessy's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 73) with the one exception noted. The Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 48, 50, & 62) are hereby ALLOWED, except as follows: Count IV ... against Harmatz ... Count VIII ... Count IX ... and Count X against ServiceNet.”

Direnzo Towing and Recovery Inc. v. Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc.
4:16-cv-10073-TSH · 2016-05-04
Motions to dismiss (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“Direnzo's motion to dismiss (Docket # 13) is denied without prejudice.”

Sergentakis v. Channell
1:16-cv-11101-DHH · 2017-01-12
Motion for entry of default (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“the Motion for Entry of Default (Docket #17) and the related request (Docket #20) are DENIED as set forth in this Order and Plaintiff is granted an extension of time until March 13, 2017 to effectuate service.”

Infinity Fluids, Corp. v. General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc.
4:14-cv-40089-TSH · 2015-07-23
Motion for protective order (plaintiff) Denied

“it is ORDERED that Plaintiff=s Motion for Protective Order of Witness Robert Evans (Docket #64) be DENIED.”

Peck v. Colvin
4:12-cv-40146-DHH · 2014-03-14
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse (Docket #20) is DENIED to the extent that it seeks remand to a different ALJ and ALLOWED in all other respects, and Defendant's Motion for Order Affirming the Decision of the Commissioner (Docket #28) is DENIED.”

S.A.N. v. Colvin
3:13-cv-30006-DHH · 2014-09-23
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket #11) is DENIED and Defendant's Motion for Order Affirming the Decision of the Commissioner (Docket #16) is ALLOWED.”

Del Rosario v. Colvin
3:13-cv-30017-DHH · 2014-03-31
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Denied

“Del Rosario's motion is denied and the Commissioner's motion is allowed.”

Grant v. Colvin
4:13-cv-13102-DHH · 2015-08-20
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff's Motion to Remand is DENIED, and Defendant's Motion to Affirm is GRANTED.”

Cook v. Berryhill
4:14-cv-40112-DHH · 2017-03-27
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Denied

“Cook's Motion to Remand (Docket #11) is DENIED and Defendant's Motion for Order Affirming the Decision of the Commissioner (Docket #21) is ALLOWED.”

Conway v. Berryhill
4:17-cv-40062-DHH · 2018-10-04
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“this Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion for an order reversing the decision of the Commissioner (Docket No. 16), DENIES Defendant's motion for an order of affirmance (Docket No. 18), and ORDERS that the case be remanded for further administrative proceedings.”

Amorello v. America's Servicing Company
4:14-cv-10200-DHH · 2014-03-03
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Moot / procedural

“Therefore, the Motion to Dismiss (Docket #6) is hereby DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with Local Rule 7.1.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 468 days (N = 1).

Median motion-to-ruling time: 262.5 days (N = 2).

Put Judge Hennessy's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Hennessy actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Hennessy's own signed orders and cites them.