Christopher L. Morgan

How Judge Morgan rules, drawn from 2 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Position
magistrate
Appointed by
Judges of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Commissioned
2026-01-27
Education
Middlebury College, B.A., 2000; Boston College Law School, J.D., 2006
Signed orders read
2

How Judge Morgan decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

For a protective order excluding a nonparty from depositions, he requires a concrete factual showing of likely disruption or harm rather than generalized concern.

“A finding of good cause must be based on a particular factual demonstration of potential harm, not on conclusory statements.”

When deciding substitution after a transfer of interest, he treats Rule 25(c) as discretionary and asks whether changing the parties would facilitate the litigation.

“the court has considerable leeway under Rule 25(c) in deciding whether to allow Maple Street to continue alone, substitute Mr. Zherka for Maple Street, or join Mr. Zherka with Maple Street.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Maple Street Holdings, LLC v. Arch Specialty Insurance Company
3:23-cv-30127-MGM · 2026-04-07
Motion for leave to file reply (nonparty) Granted

“Mr. Zherka’s motion to file a reply brief in further support of his substitution or joinder motion (Dkt. Nos. 183) is ALLOWED”

Motion for substitution or joinder (nonparty) Denied

“his motion for substitution (Dkt. No. 161) is DENIED”

Motion to stay discovery (nonparty) Moot / procedural

“rendering his motion for a stay of discovery (Dkt. No. 164) MOOT”

Motion for protective order (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s motion for a protective order enjoining Mr. Zherka from attending any of the depositions in this matter is GRANTED (Dkt. No. 186)”

Motions to strike (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s motion to strike Zherka’s non-party filings, including his response at Dkt. Nos. 188 and his motion at Dkt. No. 202 (Dkt. No. 205) is GRANTED.”

Jennings v. Captain Morty
3:25-cv-30144-CLM · 2026-05-05

Morgan recommended dismissal without prejudice after the plaintiff's attempted amended pleading remained too disorganized to identify the defendants and the conduct attributed to each. The district judge adopted the recommendation on June 30, 2026. No party motion was before Morgan, so the recommendation is excluded from motion statistics.

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 444 days (N = 1).

Median motion-to-ruling time: 21 days (N = 6).

The screened assignments included Social Security, defamation, consumer-credit, civil-rights, labor, insurance, and environmental disputes. Most were filed during the judge's first months on the bench and had not yet reached a contested ruling.

Draft for Judge Morgan with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Morgan, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Morgan's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace