Shackelford Miller Jr.

How Judge Miller rules, drawn from 25 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Miller no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Position
district
Status
Elevated to a higher court
Served
1939–1945
Appointed by
Franklin D. Roosevelt (Democratic)
Commissioned
1939-03-04
Education
Princeton University (A.B., 1914); Harvard Law School (LL.B., 1917)
Signed orders read
25

How Judge Miller decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

The court preserved a wage action for trial where competing affidavits exposed genuine factual disputes.

“A motion to dismiss can not be used as a substitute for a trial on the merits.”

A prior criminal acquittal and statutory text controlled allocation of condemnation proceeds and related property rights.

“valid provisions contained in contractual obligations can be nullified and rendered inoperative by acts of the Federal Government under its constitutional power.”

Procedural preferences

Discovery tools, rather than a bill of particulars, were the preferred way to obtain transaction details.

“the recognized and better practice under federal procedure to obtain this information by proper and timely use of the provisions of Rule 26”

A defendant had to request a jury poll at trial or waive that right.

“While he had a right to have the jury polled, yet a failure to make such a request is a waiver of that right.”

Cautions

Reconsideration and amended findings did not require the court to detail every evidentiary fact where ultimate findings were sufficient.

“It is only necessary that the Court make a finding on the essential and ultimate facts presented by the record.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Kearney v. Glenn
· 1940-03-08
Motion for more definite denial (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiff’s motion is sustained.”

Glauber v. Agee Department Stores
· 1939-12-26
Motion for jury trial (plaintiff) Granted

“The motion for a jury trial is sustained.”

Crook v. Prudential Insurance Co.
· 1940-08-20
Motions to strike (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff’s motion to strike the amended answer is overruled.”

Crull v. Wickard
· 1941-09-02
Motion to strike counterclaim (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff’s motion to strike is overruled.”

Louisville Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Yellow Cab Transit Co.
· 1944-03-17
Motion for amended findings (defendant) Denied

“The defendant’s motions are accordingly overruled.”

Motion for new trial (defendant) Denied
Brown v. Cummins Distilleries Corp.
· 1944-01-22
Motions to strike (plaintiff) Denied

“for the reasons indicated therein this motion is overruled.”

McReynolds v. Louisville Taxicab & Transfer Co.
· 1942-06-30
Motion for bill of particulars (defendant) Denied

“Its motion for a bill of particulars is overruled.”

Motions to strike (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s motions to strike are overruled.”

Cissell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
· 1941-02-20
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s motion to dismiss is sustained.”

Williams v. Bowles
· 1944-07-06
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint is sustained.”

In re Cook
· 1945-01-17
Petition to review referee order (trustee) Denied

“the petitions of the trustee and the creditor to review the order of June 22, 1944 are dismissed, and said order is affirmed.”

Petition to review referee order (creditor) Denied
Petition to review referee order (debtor) Denied

“the petition of the bankrupt to review this order of June 22, 1944 is also dismissed and said order is approved.”

Brown v. Cummins Distilleries Corp. (Estate of Dant)
· 1944-01-12
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“The motion of the defendant Farmers National Bank of Lebanon, Kentucky, executor of the estate of George W. Dant to dismiss the action as against it is sustained.”

Brookshire v. Whittemore
· 1941-07-07
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendants’ motion to dismiss is overruled.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The reviewed decisions include wartime price control, tax, condemnation, bankruptcy, labor, insurance, transportation, and criminal matters. No electronic records are available to quantify the tenure.

A historical record

Judge Miller no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.