Elwood Hamilton

How Judge Hamilton rules, drawn from 14 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Hamilton no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Position
district
Status
Elevated to a higher court
Served
1935–1938
Appointed by
Franklin D. Roosevelt (Democratic)
Commissioned
1935-06-20
Education
University of Louisville Law Department (LL.B., 1904)
Signed orders read
14

How Judge Hamilton decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In a forfeiture dispute, a prior criminal acquittal on the same facts barred the government from relitigating those facts as the basis for a statutory forfeiture.

“the judgment was directly on the point now involved, and between the same parties.”

The court limited a surety’s equitable interest to retained contract funds or sums unpaid when the contractor defaulted.

“confine the lien and equities of the surety to retained percentages or sums due but unpaid at the time of the contractor’s default.”

Procedural preferences

The court treated expansion of Kentucky’s exemptions to automobiles as a legislative choice rather than one for judicial extension.

“the matter of exempting automobiles from debts of the owner requires legislative action and cannot be accomplished by judicial interpretation.”

Bankruptcy fee awards accounted for the estate’s ability to pay as well as the lawyer’s work and results.

“the ability of the client to pay is an element to be taken into consideration”

Cautions

A lender seeking statutory relief from forfeiture had to investigate an automobile buyer’s liquor-law record after the government established such a record or reputation.

“The burden rests on the United States to first show that the claimant’s debtor has a record established by a court of competent jurisdiction for violating the liquor laws or a reputation for so doing.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re E. W. Hays & Co.
· 1935-09-16
Petition for payment (creditor) Granted

“the petitioner, Gates F. Young, liquidator of the Bankers Trust Company, is entitled to the $1,575 in the hands of the trustee”

In re McEuen
· 1937-07-22
Petition to review referee order (debtor) Denied

“Petition for review will be denied.”

In re Louisville Daily News & Enquirer
· 1937-09-15
Petition to review referee order (claimant) Denied

“The petition for review will be denied.”

United States v. One 1935 Model Chevrolet Coupé Automobile
· 1936-05-16
Claimant petition against forfeiture (claimant) Denied

“The claimant’s petition will be dismissed, and decree of forfeiture ordered.”

In re Louisville Storage Co.
· 1936-01-04
Petition for attorney fees (applicant) Granted

“H. M. Denton and Thomas S. Dawson, attorneys for the bankrupt and for its receivers, are allowed $350 for their services”

Petition for receiver fees (applicant) Granted in part

“The - receivers are each allowed $200, $100 of which shall be for expenses incurred by each of them-for • premiums on their bonds.”

Petition for receiver fees (applicant) Granted in part
Petition for wages (applicant) Granted

“F! J. Miller is allowed $90 wages as a caretaker of the property”

In re McChesney
· 1935-08-16
Petition to review referee order (petitioner) Denied

“the order of the referee should be confirmed and the petition to review dismissed.”

In re Herald-Post, Inc.
· 1937-11-27
Petition for attorney fees (applicant) Granted in part

“the bankrupt’s counsel should be awarded $750.”

Petition for attorney fees (applicant) Granted in part

“I believe a reasonable compensation for his services would be $1,700.”

Falls City Brewing Co. v. United States
· 1935-09-14
Demurrer (defendant) Granted

“the demurrer to the petition should be sustained and the plaintiff declining to plead further, an order shall be entered dismissing the petition.”

McCampbell v. McCampbell
· 1936-02-06
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“this court has no jurisdiction over the subject of this suit and it should be dismissed.”

United States v. One 1936 Model Lafayette Coupe Automobile
· 1936-05-25
Claimant petition against forfeiture (claimant) Denied

“claimant’s intervening petition should be dismissed and forfeiture decreed.”

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Lincoln Bank & Trust Co.
· 1937-02-22
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the motion to dismiss the petition should be sustained.”

United States v. One 1935 Model Pontiac Sedan Automobile
· 1936-07-22
Claimant petition against forfeiture (claimant) Granted

“to sustain the petition of the claimant and to dismiss the‘ information and return to the claimant the automobile seized”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The reviewed decisions include bankruptcy, federal tax, forfeiture, insurance, procedure, public works, and criminal matters. No electronic records are available to quantify the short district-court tenure.

A historical record

Judge Hamilton no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.