Reona Jean Daly

How Judge Daly rules, drawn from 16 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Position
magistrate
Commissioned
2016-09-09
Signed orders read
16

How Judge Daly decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

On a failure-to-prosecute motion she weighs the plaintiff's demonstrated intent to proceed: cooperation in discovery and clear signals of intent defeat the motion even after a missed deadline (Hileman), but ignoring multiple orders and a show-cause warning yields dismissal WITH prejudice (Jeffries).

“although Hileman failed to meet the deadline to file his notice to proceed pro se, 'he has made clear to the Court that he intends to proceed with the case and is cooperating in the discovery process'”

Procedural preferences

Confirms subject-matter jurisdiction before reaching the merits/disposition, including in default/removal postures (disregards fictitious defendants' citizenship under 1441(b); evaluates amount-in-controversy on record evidence).

“The undersigned is satisfied that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction to determine Plaintiff's case. 28 U.S.C. 1332(a)(1).”

Holds Rule 56 movants, including pro se litigants, to the record-citation requirement; pro se status earns liberal construction but not an exemption from Rule 56(c).

“The Court liberally construes pleadings filed by pro se litigants, but Plaintiff must still follow this rule.”

Resolves prisoner exhaustion disputes on the Pavey track: holds an evidentiary hearing before recommending summary judgment for failure to exhaust (dismissal without prejudice).

“recommending, after holding an evidentiary hearing, that the Court grant the defendants' motion for summary judgment ... and dismiss ... for failure to exhaust administrative remedies”

Cautions

Sets a high bar for inherent-authority sanctions: requires a finding of bad faith, and will steer parties to Rule 11 for litigation-conduct complaints rather than penalize mere haste/imprecision.

“Any sanctions imposed pursuant to the court's inherent authority must be premised on a finding of bad faith ... such hastiness would have been better addressed by way of a Rule 11 motion for sanctions”

Check the case posture: Daly enters final judgment when the parties consent to magistrate jurisdiction, while dispositive work in referred cases proceeds by recommendation and district-judge action.

“This case was assigned to the undersigned for final disposition upon the parties’ full consent pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

McKenney v. Germain, et al.
3:18-cv-01140-JPG-RJD · 2019-07-19
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 31); GRANTS the defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 22); DISMISSES McKenney's claims in this case without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies”

Mitchell v. Murray Energy Corp., et al.
3:17-cv-00444-NJR-RJD · 2018-01-09
Motion for sanctions (plaintiff) Denied

“The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 31) is ADOPTED in its entirety, and Plaintiff's motion for sanctions (Doc. 26) is DENIED.”

Sardon v. Tran, D.M.D., et al.
3:24-cv-01523-RJD · 2025-07-24
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.”

Hileman v. Ehler, et al.
3:18-cv-00184-NJR-RJD · 2019-04-08
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution (Doc. 24) is DENIED.”

Jeffries v. Penn-Star Insurance Co., et al.
3:22-cv-02853-RJD · 2024-08-13
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“it is RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute.”

Angus v. DG Retail, LLC (d/b/a Dollar General), et al.
3:24-cv-00536-RJD-SMY · 2024-12-16
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Denied

“the Court finds no clear error in Judge Daly's findings, analysis and conclusions, and adopts her Report and Recommendation in its entirety. ... Plaintiff's motion to remand (Doc. 12) is DENIED.”

Lindsey v. McClanahan
3:24-cv-02290-RJD · 2025-12-05
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted in part

“Defendant Crane are DISMISSED without prejudice. Count 1 against Defendant McClanahan”

Ezell v. Saroka
3:24-cv-02300-RJD · 2026-05-12
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted in part

“(Doc. 63) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The following claims are DISMISSED”

Cook v. United States
3:24-cv-01152-RJD · 2026-02-10
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Alternatively, to Enter Summary Judgment (Doc. 24) is DENIED as premature”

Hartzol v. Hart
3:25-cv-00241-RJD · 2026-06-03
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

Jakita M. v. Commissioner of Social Security
3:23-cv-03534-RJD · 2025-03-31
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“disability benefits is REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner for rehearing and”

Perigo v. Richert
3:22-cv-01540-RJD · 2025-08-07
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted in part

“Defendant Craig Richert (Count 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice.”

Draft for Judge Daly with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Daly, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Daly's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace