David R. Herndon

How Judge Herndon rules, drawn from 19 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Herndon no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Position
district
Status
Retired 2019
Served
1998–2019
Appointed by
Bill Clinton (Democratic)
Commissioned
1998-10-22
Education
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, B.A. (1974); Southern Illinois University School of Law, J.D. (1977)
Signed orders read
19

How Judge Herndon decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Schuchman, Herndon treated actual conduct and intended permanence as central to whether a property remained the insureds’ residence.

“The controlling factor is intent, as evidenced by the acts of the person whose residency is questioned.”

Procedural preferences

In Walker, Herndon granted a short stay where the opposing parties could identify no prejudice and a pending higher-court decision could affect the claims.

“they have not shown, and the Court cannot fathom, how the requested stay could cause them any prejudice.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Smith v. Phoenix Seating Systems, LLC
· 2012-09-10
Summary judgment (Phoenix Seating Systems, LLC) Denied

“defendant Phoenix’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED (Doc. 114).”

Summary judgment (Apria Healthcare Group, Inc.) Granted

“Defendant Apria’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED (Doc. 113).”

Schuchman v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance
· 2012-07-03
Summary judgment (State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company) Granted

“defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED (Doc. 19).”

Summary judgment (plaintiffs) Denied

“plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is DENIED (Doc. 17).”

In re Syngenta Mass Tort Actions
· 2017-04-03
Motions to dismiss (Syngenta defendants) Granted in part

“Syngenta’s motion to dismiss, Doc. 116, is hereby granted in part and denied in part, as set forth herein.”

Lathrop v. Juneau & Associates, Inc. P.C.
· 2004-02-11
Motions to dismiss (Juneau defendants) Granted in part

“The Court GRANTS the Juneau Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs federal FOIA claim (Doc. 4). The Court GRANTS the Juneau Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs 18 U.S.C. § 1862(c) claim against Juneau & Associates in regard to the ‘Juneau & Enterprise’ (Doc. 4). The Court DENIES all the other bases for dismissal submitted by the Juneau Defendants (Doc. 4, 5).”

Motions to strike (Juneau defendants) Granted in part

“The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the Juneau Defendants’ motion to strike certain portions of Plaintiffs complaint (Doc. 4, 5).”

Lathrop v. Juneau & Associates, Inc. P.C.
· 2004-02-11
Motions to dismiss (Granite City defendants) Granted in part

“For the reasons stated above, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the Granite City Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doe. 11).”

West American Insurance v. Mund
· 2007-06-29
Summary judgment (West American Insurance Company) Granted

“the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (Doc. 54).”

Motion for hearing (West American Insurance Company) Moot / procedural

“the Court DENIES as moot Plaintiffs motion for hearing on *1079 Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (Doc. 90).”

Broadwater v. Heidtman Steel Products, Inc.
· 2003-05-29
Motions to remand (plaintiffs) Denied

“the Court DENIES Plaintiffs motion to remand. (Doc. 9).”

Corobbo v. Internal Revenue Service
· 2005-05-03
Motion to reconsider (United States) Granted

“The Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to reconsider and on reconsideration GRANTS the request to dismiss Plaintiffs § 6511 claim (Doc. 11).”

Reiser v. Residential Funding Corp.
· 2005-01-19
Class certification (plaintiffs) Denied

“the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion for certification of national class (Doc. 35).”

Walker v. Monsanto Co. Pension Plan
· 2006-10-25
Motions to stay (plaintiffs) Granted

“Plaintiffs’ Motion to Stay Counts VII, VIII, and IX of the Consolidated Class Action Complaint is GRANTED (Doc. 144).”

Christiansen v. Adams
· 2008-06-20
Motion to set aside default (Adams) Granted

“the Court GRANTS Adams’ motion to set aside default (Doc. 44)”

Default judgment (Christiansen) Moot / procedural

“DENIES as moot Christiansen’s motion for default judgment (Doc. 35).”

Board of Education v. County of St. Clair
· 2012-10-25
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“the Court pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), Court GRANTS defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 19) and DISMISSES plaintiffs cause of action for lack of standing.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 424 days (N = 5).

The five sampled terminated matters included personal injury, civil rights, employment, maritime or interstate-commerce litigation, and other federal statutory claims.

A historical record

Judge Herndon no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.