Maria Valdez

How Judge Valdez rules, drawn from 24 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Position
magistrate
Commissioned
2005-05-20
Education
University of California, Los Angeles, B.A.; University of California, Hastings College of the Law, J.D.
Signed orders read
24

How Judge Valdez decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

The seven sampled Social Security decisions include three affirmances and four partial remands. The remands generally addressed discrete gaps in the administrative analysis rather than awarding benefits outright.

“For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 29] is granted in part and denied in part, and the Commissioner's cross-motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 31] is denied. The Court finds that this matter should be remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this Order.”

In consent Social Security cases, Valdez also affirmed agency decisions when she found the administrative record sufficient, denying the claimant's request to reverse or remand.

“For the reasons that follow, Plaintiff's motion to reverse or remand the Commissioner's decision [Doc. No. 16] is denied, and the Commissioner's cross-motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 21] is granted.”

In the sampled discovery ruling, Valdez granted only part of a motion to compel rather than ordering the requested production wholesale.

“For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Discovery Responses [Doc. No. 39] is granted in part and denied in part.”

Cautions

One consent fee-shifting decision awarded the prevailing plaintiff $164,955.37 in attorney fees.

“Plaintiff is awarded $164,955.37 in attorney's fees.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Kaczmarek v. Berryhill (Acting Commissioner of Social Security)
1:17-cv-02785 · 2018-11-28
Social security review (plaintiff) Denied

“For the reasons that follow, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 19] is denied and the Commissioner's cross-motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 27] is granted.”

Larry H. v. Kijakazi (Acting Commissioner of Social Security)
1:20-cv-05354 · 2022-09-28
Social security review (plaintiff) Denied

“For the reasons that follow, Plaintiff's motion to reverse or remand the Commissioner's decision [Doc. No. 16] is denied, and the Commissioner's cross-motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 21] is granted.”

Heard v. Dart (Cook County Sheriff)
1:14-cv-09205 · 2015-10-07
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“For the reasons stated herein, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) [Doc. No. 13] is denied.”

UNITE HERE Health v. La Plaza Secaucus, LLC and Rosdev Hospitality Secaucus, L.P.
1:13-cv-00237 · 2014-01-27
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Doc. No. 20] is denied.”

Resurrection Healthcare and Factory Mutual Insurance Co. v. GE Health Care
1:07-cv-05980 · 2009-03-16
Motions to compel (plaintiff) Granted in part

“For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Discovery Responses [Doc. No. 39] is granted in part and denied in part.”

Petrovic v. City of Chicago, et al.
1:06-cv-06111 · 2008-03-21
Motion to bar testimony (defendant) Granted in part

“For the reasons stated above, Defendants' Motion to Bar J. Thomas' Testimony or in the Alternative to Depose Thomas [Doc. No. 180] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.”

Brogato v. Proviso Township Mental Health Commission, et al.
1:04-cv-07493 · 2008-03-31
Motion for attorney fees (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiff is awarded $164,955.37 in attorney's fees.”

Cotton v. Adams, et al. (City of Chicago police officers)
1:16-cv-04565 · 2017-02-23
Motion to enforce settlement (defendant) Granted

“It is for those aforementioned reasons; the Court respectfully recommends that Defendants' Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement [Doc. No. 42] be GRANTED.”

Sarah W. v. Kijakazi (Acting Commissioner of Social Security)
1:21-cv-01498 · 2022-09-09
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted in part

“For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 12] is granted in part and denied in part, and the Commissioner's cross-motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 17] is denied. The Court finds that this matter should be remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this Order.”

Eric H. v. Saul (Commissioner of Social Security)
1:18-cv-06382 · 2020-06-11
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted in part

“For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's request to reverse the Commissioner's decision is granted in part and denied in part, and the Commissioner's cross-motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 24] is denied. The Court finds that this matter should be remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this Order.”

Edgar W. v. O'Malley (Commissioner of Social Security)
1:15-cv-07571 · 2024-03-06
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted in part

“For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 29] is granted in part and denied in part, and the Commissioner's cross-motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 31] is denied. The Court finds that this matter should be remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this Order.”

Sean P. v. Saul (Commissioner of Social Security)
1:19-cv-00408 · 2020-06-11
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted in part

“For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 15] is granted in part and denied in part, and the Commissioner's cross-motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 22] is denied. The Court finds that this matter should be remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this Order.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

  • The recent assigned docket is primarily duty-magistrate work, including sealed miscellaneous proceedings and criminal assignments.
  • The written-order sample supplies the civil case mix: Social Security consent decisions, other consent civil rulings, referred discovery, witness issues, and settlement or dismissal recommendations.
  • This describes observed matters rather than their frequency across the full docket.

Draft for Judge Valdez with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Valdez, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Valdez's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace