Jeffrey Irvine Cummings

How Judge Cummings rules, drawn from 16 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Appointed by
Joe Biden (Democratic)
Commissioned
2023-10-10
ABA rating
Well Qualified
Education
Michigan State University, B.A., with high honors, 1984; Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law, J.D., cum laude (Order of the Coif), 1987
Signed orders read
16

How Judge Cummings decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Social Security appeals he applies ordinary substantial-evidence review and remands where the ALJ's analysis is deficient (e.g. a finding of medical improvement or a step-five conclusion not supported by substantial evidence, or a failure to address a significant favorable finding), but affirms where the ALJ properly assessed and incorporated the medical evidence. In this small slice he remanded 5 of 7 SSA appeals; treat the lean toward remand as illustrative, not a rate.

“The Court agrees that the ALJ's finding of medical improvement is not supported by substantial evidence and that this error requires remand.”

On FDCPA statutory damages he sided with the (minority) view that a defendant's policies and procedures are admissible to show intent and the nature of the noncompliance, reasoning it better serves the Congressional purpose of statutory damages (creating an incentive to obey the law) even though the cited caselaw majority view was to the contrary.

“Although the caselaw cited by defendants appears to represent the majority view of the courts that have considered this issue, the caselaw cited by plaintiff appears to better align with the Congressional purpose underlying statutory damages (namely, to ‘create an incentive to obey the law,’ Strange, 796 F.Supp. at 1120) by allowing consideration of evidence of a defendant’s policies and procedures where they arguably led to the FDCPA violation.”

Procedural preferences

Conducts a careful personal-jurisdiction (Rule 12(b)(2)) analysis and will dismiss a defendant for want of general or specific jurisdiction on the record before him, mooting the rest of that defendant's motion rather than reaching it.

“Accordingly, the Court finds on this record that it has neither general nor specific jurisdiction over Google, and it therefore grants Google's motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction.”

In expert-admissibility disputes, he separates attacks on methodology from disputes about data quality, benchmarks, and survey design; where the methodology is sufficiently reliable, he often leaves those latter disputes for cross-examination and the factfinder.

“plaintiffs’ attack on the exclusion of Raptors or any missing data in Soderborg’s Opinion No. 2 analysis goes to the quality of Soderborg’s data rather than the reliability of his methodology.”

Cautions

Treats undeveloped, perfunctory arguments as waived — a counsel who does not develop an argument with citation to supporting evidence/authority can lose it on that ground alone. Seen in an SSA appeal denial; the same waiver principle (citing Spath v. Hays Wheels) appears in his district-era summary-judgment reasoning.

“Claimant's arguments are largely undeveloped and, accordingly, are waived.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Jason S. v. Kijakazi (Acting Commissioner of Social Security)
1:21-cv-00419 · 2023-01-30
Social security review (plaintiff) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, Claimant's motion to reverse the Commissioner's decision to deny him DIBs, (Dckt. #15), is granted and the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment, (Dckt. #21), is denied.”

Christine N. v. Kijakazi (Acting Commissioner of Social Security)
1:19-cv-02171 · 2022-02-16
Social security review (plaintiff) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, Claimant's motion for summary remand (Dckt. #20) is granted and the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment is denied (Dckt. #27, 28).”

Gregory G. v. Kijakazi (Acting Commissioner of Social Security)
1:20-cv-03680 · 2023-03-16
Social security review (plaintiff) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, Claimant's motion for summary judgment (Dckt. #17), is granted and the Commissioner's request to affirm the decision, (Dckt. #23), is denied.”

James J. v. Kijakazi (Commissioner of Social Security)
1:19-cv-02903 · 2022-02-24
Social security review (plaintiff) Granted

“For the foregoing reason, Claimant's motion for summary remand (Dckt. #18) is granted and the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment (Dckt. #26) is denied.”

Heather F. v. Kijakazi (Acting Commissioner of Social Security)
1:19-cv-08511 · 2022-06-03
Social security review (plaintiff) Granted

“Claimant's motion to reverse the Commissioner's decision to deny her SSI benefits (Dckt. #20) is granted and the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment (Dckt. #21) is denied.”

Dante B. v. Kijakazi (Acting Commissioner of Social Security)
1:20-cv-01104 · 2022-08-31
Social security review (plaintiff) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, Claimant's motion to reverse the decision of the Commissioner, (Dckt. #17), is denied and the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment, (Dckt. # 20), is granted. The decision of the ALJ is affirmed.”

Mark H. v. Kijakazi (Commissioner of Social Security)
1:20-cv-07726 · 2022-09-19
Social security review (plaintiff) Denied

“For the reasons that follow, Claimant's motion for summary judgment, (Dckt. #14), is denied.”

Thomas v. LVNV Funding, LLC and Resurgent Capital Services, L.P.
1:21-cv-01948 · 2023-12-11
Motion in limine (plaintiff) Granted

“the Court holds that evidence of defendants' policies and procedures is relevant and admissible to the determination of the amount of statutory damages that the jury may award to plaintiff pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §1692k(b)(1).”

Matricciani v. American Homeowner Preservation, Inc., Justworks Employment Group, LLC, and Jorge Newbery
1:23-cv-04120 · 2024-02-22
Motion to compel arbitration (defendant) Granted in part

“The Court grants in part the motion to compel arbitration.”

Portillo v. Nebula Genomics, Inc., Meta Platforms, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, and Google LLC
N.D. Ill. 1:24-cv-09894 (order docketed in transferee D. Mass. as 1:25-cv-12288-BEM) · 2025-07-24
Motions to dismiss (defendant (Meta Platforms, Inc.)) Granted

“Meta Platform, Inc.'s motion to dismiss, (Dckt. #45), and defendant Microsoft Corporation's motion to dismiss, (Dckt. #48), are granted and plaintiff's unjust enrichment claims against them are dismissed without prejudice to the refiling of the claims in the District of Massachusetts.”

Motions to dismiss (defendant (Microsoft Corporation)) Granted
Motions to dismiss (defendant (Google LLC; Rule 12(b)(2))) Granted

“the portion of defendant Google LLC's motion to dismiss, (Dckt. #51), premised on Rule 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction is granted and the remainder of the motion is denied as moot.”

Motions to transfer (defendant (Nebula Genomics, Inc.)) Granted

“Nebula Genomics, Inc.'s motion to transfer, or in the alternative, to dismiss, (Dckt. #54), is granted as to the motion to transfer, and denied as to the request to dismiss on grounds of mootness.”

Suggs v. Dicera
1:23-cv-02327 · 2026-01-22
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“For the reasons stated above, defendants’ motion for summary judgment, (Dckt. #70), is granted and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, (Dckt. #73), is denied.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied
O'Connor v. Ford Motor Company
1:19-cv-05045 · 2026-01-26
Judgment on the pleadings (defendant) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, Ford’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, (Dckt. #432), is denied.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 112 days (N = 19).

  • His enumerable docket is his October-2023-onward district-judge assignments.
  • The 2024 sample shows a typical N.D.
  • Ill. Eastern-Division (Chicago) civil mix plus a criminal calendar.
  • A notable cluster: numerous CDK Global cases (the In re CDK Global Data Security Consumer Litigation group) were assigned to him and terminated together on consolidation.
  • Many short-duration terminations are state-court removals later remanded or settled, voluntary dismissals, or Schedule A trademark and copyright enforcement actions.

Draft for Judge Cummings with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Cummings, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Cummings's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace