Edward A. Bobrick

How Judge Bobrick rules, drawn from 24 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Bobrick no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Position
magistrate
Status
No longer serving
Appointed by
Judges of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Signed orders read
24

How Judge Bobrick decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Bobrick placed the burden on the party resisting discovery to establish that the work-product doctrine protected the requested documents.

“The burden here is on the defendant to establish that the work product doctrine immunizes the documents at issue from discovery.”

In a pleading dispute, Bobrick accepted allegations made on information and belief under Rule 8's notice-pleading standard.

“Such allegations are acceptable under the liberal, notice pleading requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a).”

On Social Security review, Bobrick emphasized that a reviewing court may not reweigh the administrative evidence or substitute its judgment for the agency's.

“The court may not reweigh the evidence, or substitute its judgment for that of the Social Security Administration.”

Procedural preferences

Bobrick treated psychotherapist-patient privilege as waivable but evaluated the scope of waiver case by case.

“Like other privileges, however, the psychotherapist-patient privilege can be waived.”

Bobrick denied amendment after reviewing the proposed pleading and finding the new theories futile.

“In this case, review of plaintiffs proposed amendments demonstrates that they would be futile and her Rule 15(a) motion must be denied.”

Bobrick described reconsideration as a limited remedy, not a second opportunity for arguments or evidence that could have been presented earlier.

“they are not opportunities to rehash old arguments or submit new evidence that could have already been presented.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

National Accident Insurance Underwriters, Inc. v. Citibank, F.S.B.
· 2003-01-31
Motion to strike affirmative defenses (plaintiff) Denied

“the plaintiffs motion to strike the defendant’s affirmative defenses is DENIED”

Motion to dismiss counterclaim (plaintiff) Granted

“plaintiffs motion to dismiss defendant’s counterclaim is GRANTED”

National Accident Insurance Underwriters, Inc. v. Citibank, F.S.B.
· 2002-08-12
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“the defendant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs complaint is hereby DENIED.”

National Accident Insurance Underwriters, Inc. v. Citibank, F.S.B.
· 2002-09-27
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“the defendant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs complaint is hereby DENIED.”

Armstrong v. Barnhart
· 2003-10-15
Summary judgment (defendant Commissioner) Granted

“the defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is DENIED.”

Motorola, Inc. v. Kuehne & Nagel, Inc.
· 2001-11-06
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted

“defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.”

Syscon, Inc. v. Vehicle Valuation Services, Inc.
· 2003-08-04
Motions to dismiss (defendant Blitstein) Denied

“defendant Blitstein’s motion to dismiss the complaint as to him is denied.”

In re the Extradition of Molnar
· 2002-05-10
Request for extradition (United States on behalf of Hungary) Denied

“the request for extradition is hereby DENIED.”

Anderson v. Village of Oswego
· 2000-08-09
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint is DENIED.”

Palmer v. Barnhart
· 2002-10-18
Petition for attorneys fees (plaintiff) Granted

“the plaintiffs petition for an award of attorneys’ fees under EAJA is granted in the amount of $16,910.41.”

Broadnax v. ABF Freight Systems, Inc.
· 1999-07-30
Motion to adjudicate lien (plaintiff estate) Granted

“CIGNA’s claim is hereby adjudicated as zero and is DENIED.”

Bear Stearns & Co., Inc. v. Wyler
· 2002-01-23
Motion to compel document production (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiffs motion to compel compliance by Joel Wyler with requests for production of documents in GRANTED, as limited by this court’s order of November 15, 2001.”

In re the Extradition of Molnar
· 2002-03-18
Motion for release on bail (defendant) Granted

“it is hereby ordered that Sandor Molnar be released from custody upon the posting of real property as security for $100,000 bond”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Twenty assigned matters were enumerated. Five terminated civil matters were sampled across railroad injury, forfeiture, employment, and environmental cases. Their durations ranged from 517 to 2,154 days, with a median of 759 days; every sampled entry stream was empty, so no docket motion or timing claim is made.

A historical record

Judge Bobrick no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.