Ann Claire Williams

How Judge Williams rules, drawn from 18 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Position
district
Appointed by
Ronald Reagan (Republican)
Commissioned
1985-04-04
Education
Wayne State University, B.S., 1970; University of Michigan, M.A., 1972; Notre Dame Law School, J.D., 1975
Signed orders read
18

How Judge Williams decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Boese, Williams preserved a false-light claim where deposition and interview evidence could support a finding that the publisher subjectively doubted the challenged account.

“plaintiff has set forth enough facts in the 12(n) Statement based on the depositions of Pennington, Malm, and Brennan and the videotaped interviews with Virginia Weathers and her attorney to establish that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to actual malicé.”

In Countryman, Williams required the movants to show a clear balance favoring another forum rather than merely moving the burden between parties.

“A transfer motion will not be granted when it would merely shift inconvenience from one party to another.”

Procedural preferences

In Morgan, Williams required production of internal accident reports after applying federal privilege law and the broad disclosure policy governing federal-question discovery.

“The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure establish a broad policy which favors full disclosure of facts during discovery.”

In Fortenberry, Williams treated the movant's supported factual statement as admitted after the opposing party failed to file the required response.

“Therefore, the court will deem the facts in defendant's 12(m) statement as admitted.”

Cautions

In LaSalle National Bank, Williams denied a partial-summary-judgment request filed seven years into the case and only days after the scheduled trial date.

“The motion raises an interesting and important issue that plaintiffs should have raised months or years ago.”

In Denson, Williams applied the governing disability statute to the applicant's own limitations rather than treating an impairment category as automatically dispositive.

“Whether a person is disabled requires the court to perform an individualized inquiry, determined on a case-by-case basis.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Morgan v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
96 C 6977 · 1998-09-02
Motion to compel discovery (plaintiff Brian D. Morgan) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, the court affirms Magistrate Judge Pallmeyer’s decision to grant Morgan’s Motion to Compel and overrules Union Pacific’s objections.”

Denson v. Village of Bridgeview
96 C 5819 · 1998-08-24
Summary judgment (plaintiff Robert Denson) Granted

“For the reasons set forth above, the court grants Denson’s motion for summary judgment and denies the Village’s motion for summary judgment.”

Summary judgment (defendant Village of Bridgeview) Denied
Motion for leave to amend (plaintiff Robert Denson) Granted

“The court also grants Denson’s motion for leave to add the Board as a defendant and dismisses the Village as a defendant in this case.”

Brooks v. Apfel
94 CV 7374 · 1999-09-28
Summary judgment (plaintiff Richard A. Brooks) Denied

“For the reasons set forth above, the court denies plaintiffs motion for summary judgment [35-1] and grants defendant’s motion for summary judgment [36-1].”

Summary judgment (defendant Commissioner of Social Security) Granted
LaSalle National Bank v. Massachusetts Bay Insurance Co.
90 C 2005 · 1997-03-12
Summary judgment (plaintiffs) Denied

“For reasons set forth above, the court denies plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on defendants’ counterclaim.”

Fortenberry v. United Airlines
96 C 3198 · 1998-09-30
Summary judgment (defendant United Air Lines) Granted

“For the reasons set forth above, the court grants defendant’s motion for summary judgment.”

Yellow Cab Co. v. City of Chicago
97 C 8753 · 1998-04-30
Motions to dismiss (defendants City of Chicago and commissioner) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, the court grants defendants’ motion to dismiss count II and therefore dismisses this suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.”

Pappas v. City of Calumet City
96 C 0551 · 1998-06-30
Summary judgment (plaintiff James J. Pappas) Granted

“The court grants Pappas’ motion for summary judgment and denies the City’s motion for summary judgment.”

Summary judgment (defendant City of Calumet City) Denied
Countryman ex rel. Upstate New York Pension & Retirement Fund v. Stein Roe & Farnham
87 C 3861 · 1987-11-23
Motions to transfer (defendant trustees and funds) Granted

“Therefore, defendants’ motion to transfer this case to the Northern District of New York is granted.”

Gallagher v. Kleinwort Benson Government Securities, Inc.
86 C 1455 · 1988-10-24
Summary judgment (defendant Kleinwort Benson Government Securities, Inc.) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, the defendant’s summary judgment motion is granted.”

Littlefield v. Mack
88 C 9803 · 1991-01-21
Motion for bond on appeal (plaintiff Susanne Littlefield) Denied

“For the following reasons, the court denies plaintiff’s motion insofar as it requests a bond to secure payment of attorney’s fees on appeal.”

Kimmel v. Wirtz
· 1992-06-05
Motion for leave to amend (plaintiff Helen Kimmel) Denied

“For the reasons stated above, plaintiff’s motion to amend her complaint to include a claim for monetary relief against defendants American Mart Corporation or 333 Building Corporation pursuant to 32 Ill.Ann.Stat. § 12.55 or the court’s federal equitable powers is denied.”

Allied Vision Group, Inc. v. RLI Professional Technologies, Inc.
· 1996-02-13
Motions to dismiss (defendant RLI Professional Technologies, Inc.) Granted

“For the reasons set forth above, the court grants defendant’s motion to dismiss Count II of plaintiff’s Amended Complaint.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 1900 days (N = 3).

The fixed five-matter sample included labor, statutory racketeering, employment civil-rights, prisoner civil-rights, and trademark cases. All five metadata records were terminated, but one closed after Williams left the district court and the sample is not a distribution of her full caseload.

Draft for Judge Williams with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Williams, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Williams's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace