Robert J. Kauffman

United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois magistrate Retired 2000 15 signed orders read

Judge Kauffman no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Kauffman decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

His recommendations were not rubber-stamped: district judges rejected his R&R outright in at least four of the fifteen reviewed matters here (a maritime limitation-of-liability question, an FTCA jurisdictional-timeliness question, a state repose-versus-tolling question, and an RCRA pleading-sufficiency question), each time on a close or unsettled legal question where the district judge weighed the circuit authority differently.

“The Court must disagree with the Magistrate Judge's reasoning and recommendation for at least three reasons.”

Procedural preferences

As the parties' consented judge of record in Section 1983 police-misconduct suits, resolved credibility disputes (whose testimony to believe on probable cause and use of force) as the trier of fact rather than deferring them to a jury, and his factual findings were upheld on appeal under the deferential clearly-erroneous standard.

“the magistrate judge found that there had been probable cause for Kraushaar's arrest on the DUI charge and probable cause to believe that he was hiding something in his clothing, thereby giving rise to the strip search.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Greenley v. Meersman
93-4009 / 838 F. Supp. 381 · 1993-11-29
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [Doc. #9] is REJECTED and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. #5] is DENIED.”

Willis v. United States
93-1027 / 879 F. Supp. 889 · 1994-09-14
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“The Court cannot accept the Magistrate Judge's recommendation in this case... the Court finds that the effect of Irwin is not to alter the stature of the FTCA time limitations from jurisdictional prerequisites to mere affirmative defenses.”

Nickum v. Village of Saybrook
96-1350 / 972 F. Supp. 1160 · 1997-07-28
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“the Village's Motion to Dismiss Counts I, III, and IV of the Complaint is DENIED, and the Village's Motion to Dismiss Count II is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part... Richard Robbins' Motion to Dismiss Count X of the Complaint is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.”

Gehrt v. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Cooperative Extension Service
96-1317 / 974 F. Supp. 1178 · 1997-07-11
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“The Magistrate Judge issued his Report and Recommendation on May 22, 1997, recommending that all prayers for punitive damages should be stricken from the Complaint but that the motion to dismiss should be denied in all other respects.”

Resolution Trust Corp. v. S & K Chevrolet
93-1308 / 868 F. Supp. 1047 · 1994-11-08
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“The Magistrate Judge recommends that Motions to Dismiss be denied as to Count One and that the Motions to Dismiss be allowed as to Count Two.”

Resolution Trust Corp. v. S & K Chevrolet Co.
93-1308 / 918 F. Supp. 1235 · 1996-02-28
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Magistrate Judge Kauffman denied Defendant's motion to dismiss on the basis that he could find no new arguments that were not already presented and rejected by the Court in its previous Order of November 8, 1994.”

Gordon v. Illinois National Guard
46 F. Supp. 2d 817 · 1999-04-26
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“This Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [# 15]. This case is TERMINATED... The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [# 8] is therefore GRANTED, and this Case is TERMINATED.”

Varner v. Illinois State University
972 F. Supp. 458 · 1997-07-30
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“For the reasons set forth herein, the Report & Recommendation is ADOPTED in part and REJECTED in part. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [# 71] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [# 18] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART AS MOOT.”

Hinkle v. Henderson
93-1438 / 896 F. Supp. 190 · 1995-08-16
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [Doc. #20] is REJECTED. Defendant's Motions to Dismiss [Docs. #4, #8, and #16] are GRANTED. This case is dismissed with prejudice.”

Diehl v. The ACRI Co.
92-1224 / 910 F. Supp. 439 · 1995-09-26
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“The Court dismisses the rescission claim of Count I with prejudice.”

Griffith v. Keystone Steel & Wire Co.
858 F. Supp. 802 · 1994-07-22
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“this Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Kauffman (# 33) and the Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (# 17, 21, 23) are DENIED.”

Evans v. Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc.
884 F. Supp. 1209 · 1995-05-04
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“neither Plaintiff nor Defendants have objected to the portion of the Magistrate Judge's report which recommends that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss [Docs. # 6 and # 8] be granted as to Count One of the Complaint... Accordingly, the Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation.”

Motions to remand (plaintiff) Denied

“neither Plaintiff nor Defendants have objected to the portion of the Magistrate Judge's report which recommended that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand [Doc. # 14] be denied... the Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation in both these regards.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Sampled cases assigned to him span 1984-1998: a heavy mix of state-prisoner Section 1983 and habeas matters (the bulk of his 636(b) referral docket), Social Security appeals, and general civil/diversity and employment cases on which he sat by consent or handled non-dispositive referrals.

A historical record

Judge Kauffman no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.