Richard Henry Mills

How Judge Mills rules, drawn from 24 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Mills no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Position
district
Status
Retired 2023
Served
1985–2023
Appointed by
Ronald Reagan (Republican)
Commissioned
1985-07-22
Education
Illinois College, B.A., 1951; Mercer University School of Law, J.D., 1957; University of Virginia School of Law, LL.M., 1982
Signed orders read
24

How Judge Mills decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

States the disposition in a compressed closing paragraph introduced by 'Ergo,' and writes 'ALLOWED' where most federal judges write 'GRANTED': an idiom carried from nineteen years on the Illinois state bench. The closing line usually names the motion and its docket entry number.

“Ergo, the Motion of Defendant Sugar Creek Realty, LLC d/b/a/ as Pine Woods Apartments for Summary Judgment [d/e 15] is ALLOWED as to the Counts asserting Hostile Work Environment and Constructive Discharge.”

Resolves a motion issue by issue rather than granting or denying it wholesale, and says so expressly in the disposition.

“Ergo, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [d/e 6] is DENIED on the issue of personal jurisdiction, but GRANTED on the issue of failure to state a claim.”

Grants summary judgment to whichever side has carried it, including moving plaintiffs and benefit funds; the record is not one-directional.

“Ergo, the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [d/e 11] is ALLOWED.”

Procedural preferences

Where a parallel proceeding makes a threshold ruling premature, prefers a stay to a dismissal and expressly preserves the unreached arguments for renewal once the stay lifts.

“Defendants’ motions [d/e 9,17] are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. In particular, the motion for a stay is GRANTED. The motions to dismiss are DENIED, though those arguments may be resurrected after the stay is lifted. Lynch’s motion to strike various documents [d/e 19] is DENIED.”

Decides a case on the controlling threshold ground and then clears the remaining motions as moot rather than reaching them.

“All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.”

Disposes of related motions together in a single omnibus order rather than issuing them piecemeal; several orders here resolve two or three distinct motions at once.

“In sum: motion to dismiss denied; motion to remand allowed.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Smith v. American General Life Insurance
06-3235 · 2008-04-04
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Because the doctrine of judicial estoppel bars Smith’s claims, Franklin Life’s motions for summary judgment and entry of judgment are GRANTED.”

Garcia v. Illinois State Police
05-3273 · 2008-04-22
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“After investing an unwarranted amount of time in this case, the Court now grants summary judgment for all defendants.”

Blagojevich v. Gates
05-3190 · 2008-06-13
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“The Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is DENIED.”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Alternatively, the Defendants’ motion to dismiss is ALLOWED.”

Covell v. Menkis
05-3207 · 2008-08-05
Motion for partial summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“The Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment [d/e 45] is DENIED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment [d/e 42] is ALLOWED.”

Lynch v. Nolan
08-3295 · 2009-02-23
Motions to stay (defendant) Granted

“Defendants’ motions [d/e 9,17] are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. In particular, the motion for a stay is GRANTED. The motions to dismiss are DENIED, though those arguments may be resurrected after the stay is lifted. Lynch’s motion to strike various documents [d/e 19] is DENIED.”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied
Motions to strike (plaintiff) Denied
Mutter v. Sanders
06-3259 · 2009-05-04
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.”

Mohr v. Targeted Genetics, Inc.
09-3170 · 2010-03-03
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“In sum: motion to dismiss denied; motion to remand allowed.”

Motions to remand (plaintiff) Granted
Goetz v. City of Springfield
06-cv-3283 · 2010-03-26
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“The Defendants are granted summary judgment on all claims, except the Section 1983 due process claims against Mayor Timothy Davlin and Todd Renfrew.”

Wemple v. All Illinois Judicial Circuits
3:11-cv-03071 · 2011-04-21
Motion for leave to proceed ifp (plaintiff) Granted

“the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is ALLOWED.”

Railroad Maintenance & Industrial Health & Welfare Fund v. ProCut Concrete Sawing Services, Inc.
09-cv-3001 · 2011-05-23
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment is ALLOWED.”

Motion for attorney fees (plaintiff) Granted

“The Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs is ALLOWED.”

Jackson v. Illinois Laborers' & Contracting Training Trust Fund
11-3334 · 2011-12-07
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“The Defendant’s Motion to dismiss is ALLOWED.”

United States v. Burge
11-cr-30003 · 2011-12-19
Motions to dismiss (plaintiff) Granted

“Ergo, the Government’s Motion to Dismiss Third-Party Claim of Dianna L. Burge is ALLOWED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

  • Sampled assignments run from 1979 to 2022.
  • The earliest rows predate his 1985 commission and are inherited reassignments; the 1985-86 cohort is a general civil docket (railroad and towing matters, bank and FDIC collection, Social Security, tax, product liability, environmental and RICO), with nine of twenty carrying Magistrate Judge Charles H.
  • Evans as the referral judge. By 1998 the docket is dominated by prisoner petitions, habeas, motions to vacate sentence and prison-conditions cases, alongside employment civil rights, ERISA collection and United States student-loan recovery suits.
  • The 2008 window, which overlaps the published opinions in this record, is heavier on ERISA and benefit-fund collection, employment and FMLA claims, natural-gas pipeline condemnation, and contract and insurance disputes.
  • He was still being assigned newly filed civil cases in 2021-2022, including consumer credit, ADA employment and telephone-consumer-protection matters, in the last full year of his life.

A historical record

Judge Mills no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.