Phyllis J. Hamilton

“On January 15, 2021, defendants filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint in the above captioned action. Dkt. 20. ... For the reasons argued by defendants, the court GRANTS the motion without prejudice.”

“the court GRANTS defendants' motion to set aside default and DENIES defendants' motion to enlarge time to respond. Dkt. 24.”

“Because plaintiffs have moved to withdraw their motion for alternative service, the court DENIES plaintiffs' motion for alternative service. Dkt. 29.”

“1. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED as to both infringement”

“2. Defendants' motion for summary judgment as to non-infringement is GRANTED.”

“3. The motion to dismiss of defendants Garcia and Marquez (document 42) is GRANTED.”

“The motion for summary judgment by Moore (document 37) and that by Lewis, Hughes, and Pham (document 42) are GRANTED.”

“The issues having been duly heard and the court having granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment, it is Ordered and Adjudged that judgment is hereby entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiff.”

“For the foregoing reasons, DePuy’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s fourth cause of action for express warranty is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to the DePuy Defendants... And plaintiff’s eighth cause of action alleging a RICO violation is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to the DePuy Defendants.”

“For the reasons set forth above, the court rules as follows: As to the first cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation, FedEx’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to all plaintiffs... As to the eighth cause of action for failure to maintain payroll records, FedEx’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED as to all plaintiffs.”

“Defendants’ motion for attorneys’ fees is thus GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.”

“Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.”

“In light of this non-opposition, the court GRANTS the motion to dismiss defendants 9W Halo Holdings L.P., 9W Halo Parent LLC, KKR-VRS Credit Partners L.P., and KKR ILP LLC.”

“For the foregoing reasons, Dodgin’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s RICO claim (Claim 13) as alleged against Dodgin is GRANTED, and the claim is DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND to include allegations establishing statutory standing and identifying with particularity Dodgin’s role and actions in the alleged enterprise; Dodgin’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s negligence claim (Claim 14) as alleged against Dodgin is DENIED; and Dodgin’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s battery claim (Claim 18) as alleged against Dodgin is GRANTED, and the claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

“The Settlement Agreement submitted to the Court as Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of David E. Mastagni, which is incorporated herein by reference, is approved as fair, reasonable and just in all respects as to the Plaintiffs... This Action is dismissed WITH PREJUDICE.”