Beth Labson Freeman

United States District Court for the Northern District of California district Appointed by Barack Obama (Democratic) 23 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Ramirez v. Electronic Arts Inc.
5:20-cv-05672-BLF · 2021-03-05
Motion to compel arbitration (defendant) Granted

“the Court GRANTS EA's Motion to Compel Arbitration and STAYS the case pending the outcome of the arbitration.”

Wag Hotels, Inc. v. Wag Labs, Inc.
5:20-cv-01326-BLF · 2022-04-25
Motions to dismiss (plaintiff) Granted in part

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Wag Labs' ninth and tenth affirmative defenses are STRICKEN WITH LEAVE TO AMEND; 2. Wag Labs' counterclaims are DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND”

Talece Inc. v. Zheng Zhang
5:20-cv-03579-BLF · 2021-01-25
Motion for sanctions (defendant) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions is DENIED.”

Bazine v. Kelly Services Global, LLC
5:22-cv-07170-BLF · 2023-06-21
Motion to compel arbitration (defendant) Granted

“For the reasons discussed above, Defendants' motion to compel arbitration is GRANTED.”

Synopsys, Inc. v. Sunlune Corporation
5:24-cv-00220-BLF · 2024-11-15
Default judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc.'s motion for default judgment is GRANTED.”

May v. Google LLC
5:24-cv-01314-BLF · 2026-03-20
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“Google's motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: ... Google's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' claim No. 1 for unfair practices in violation of the UCL is GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND.”

Estate of Vela v. County of Monterey
5:16-cv-02375-BLF · 2018-08-27
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted in part

“Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment against the County is GRANTED on Claims 1, 2, and 3, insofar as those claims are based on the County's policy or custom ... Plaintiffs' motion against the County otherwise is DENIED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“The County Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED. The CFMG Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED.”

Neal v. Auction.com
5:22-cv-03400-BLF · 2022-07-25
Motion for reconsideration (plaintiff) Denied

“Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration and/or motion to alter is DENIED.”

Chavez v. Wynar
5:18-cv-02252-BLF · 2024-02-29
Judgment on the pleadings (defendant) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Roahn Wynar's motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED.”

Chinitz v. Intero Real Estate Services
5:18-cv-05623-BLF · 2021-04-12
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted in part

“Summary Judgment is GRANTED for Plaintiff on the first issue that Defendant is vicariously liable for calls made by its corporate agents and sales associates ... Summary Judgment is DENIED on Plaintiff's second issue.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“Summary Judgment is DENIED for Defendant on Plaintiff's TCPA claims; and ... Summary Judgment is GRANTED for Defendant on Plaintiff's UCL claim.”

County of Santa Clara v. Ranger
5:22-cv-08901-BLF · 2023-02-08
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiff County's motion to remand is GRANTED; (2) This action is REMANDED to the Santa Clara County Superior Court.”

Alvarez-Munguia v. Ford Motor Company
5:23-cv-02751-BLF · 2024-01-05
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Denied

“Accordingly, the motion to remand is DENIED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Freeman's San Jose caseload includes substantial technology, intellectual-property, consumer, and statutory-privacy litigation, along with criminal matters and the constitutional cases noted in her biography. Recurring subjects include arbitration clauses, consumer communications, fraud, trademarks, online platforms, firearms regulation, and children's privacy.

Put Judge Freeman's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Freeman actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Freeman's own signed orders and cites them.