Alex G. Tse

How Judge Tse rules, drawn from 38 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the Northern District of California
Position
Magistrate judge
Commissioned
January 1, 2020
Education
University of California, Berkeley (undergraduate); University of California, Hastings College of the Law (J.D.)
Signed orders read
38

About Judge Tse

Alex G. Tse has served as a United States Magistrate Judge for the Northern District of California since January 2020. He previously held several roles in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the district, including Chief of the Civil Division and Acting U.S. Attorney. He earned degrees from the University of California, Berkeley and UC Hastings College of the Law.

Judge Tse's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Tse, as published on the court's website (checked October 8, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Filing

Do not submit paper courtesy copies unless the court asks for them.

“Paper courtesy copies should not be submitted unless the Court requests them.”

Filing

File a redline concurrently with any amended pleading.

“Any party who files an amended pleading must concurrently file a redlined version comparing the amended pleading to the prior operative pleading.”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 8, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Tse decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

In the reviewed Social Security appeal, Tse ordered further administrative proceedings after the Commissioner conceded medical-opinion error, because unresolved factual disputes prevented an immediate benefits award.

“Those unresolved factual disputes render a remand for an award of benefits inap- propriate under the credit-as-true rule.”

In Genfit v. CymaBay, he denied two protective-order motions without prejudice because the discovery issues had not been presented in joint statements required by his standing order. He also denied sealing because the motion gave no good cause.

“The issues raised in those motions won’t be considered unless they are presented in one or more joint statements, in compliance with Part VII.B of the undersigned’s civil standing order.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Leopold K. v. Social Security Administration
22-cv-01583-JST · 2023-04-07
Screening or pleading dismissal recommendation (court) Granted

“On February 7, 2023, the Court adopted Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse's report and recommendation to dismiss Plaintiff Leopold K.'s complaint for failure to file an amended complaint. ... No amended complaint has been filed. Accordingly, this case is dismissed with prejudice.”

Clyde Armstrong v. Mark Rentals, et al.
3:23-cv-04707-WHO · 2024-08-20
Screening or pleading dismissal recommendation (court) Granted

“On July 18, 2024, Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse issued a Report and Recommendation that I dismiss this case with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2)(B) ... I agree that the complaint is frivolous and fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. ... I therefore ADOPT the Report and Recommendation and DISMISS this case with prejudice.”

United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft, et al.
19-cv-01391-CRB (AGT) · 2023-04-21
Discovery sanctions (plaintiff) Denied

“Even so, it is true that the Court has the authority to enforce its discovery orders and to impose sanctions when its orders are not obeyed. ... But under the circumstances, the Court, in its discretion, concludes that sanctions are not warranted. VW, in the Court's judgment, hasn't acted in bad faith. ... The SEC's motion for sanctions is denied. So too is VW's motion for reconsideration of the Court's February 10 order. ... VW's motion for leave to file a sur-reply to the SEC's motion for sanctions is also denied.”

In re: Roundup Products Liability Litigation (Estate of Kenzie Elizabeth Murdock v. Monsanto)
3:16-md-02741-VC (AGT) · 2023-06-22
Motions to compel (defendant) Granted

“Monsanto's motion to compel production of a June 3, 2022 ‘preliminary’ report by plaintiffs' expert Dr. William Sawyer—which was considered by plaintiffs' testifying expert Dr. Ron Schiff in forming his opinions in this case—is granted.”

George Jarvis Austin v. Tesla Motors, Inc.
3:23-cv-00067-AGT · 2023-07-21
Motions to compel (plaintiff) Granted in part

“By August 4, 2023, Tesla must produce all non-privileged records in its possession, custody, or control that relate to Austin's work at Tesla. ... At this time, the Court will not order Austin, as Tesla has requested, ‘to stop sending any further communications directly to Tesla or its employees’ while the case is pending.”

Black Soil Asset Management Limited, et al. v. Qian Wang (re: Qin Wang discovery dispute)
3:23-cv-04493-AGT · 2026-06-04
Motions to compel (plaintiff) Granted

“Qin Wang cannot rely on the privilege against self-incrimination to redact line entries within the CMB account statements she produced. By June 8, 2026, she must produce unredacted copies of the account statements in question.”

Motion to seal (third_party) Granted

“The redacted entries reveal personal financial information that the public doesn't need to review to understand the instant dispute. The Court grants the motion to seal. Dkt. 191.”

Martin Eng Lee v. Demas Yan, et al.
3:24-cv-03628-WHO · 2024-08-19
Screening or pleading dismissal recommendation (court) Granted

“On July 18, 2024, Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse issued a Report and Recommendation that I dismiss this case due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. ... Accordingly, I agree that I lack subject matter jurisdiction and so I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation. This case is hereby DISMISSED.”

District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, et al. v. Combos Glass, Inc.
3:23-cv-02301-JD · 2024-09-04
Default judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“In this ERISA action, Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse filed a report recommending that plaintiffs' motion for default judgment, Dkt. No. 22, be granted. ... No objections have been filed ... After an independent review, the Court adopts the report and recommendation. Plaintiffs are awarded $202,687.56 in damages.”

Genfit S.A. v. CymaBay Therapeutics Inc.
3:21-cv-00395-MMC (AGT) · 2021-10-13
Motion for protective order (unclear) Denied

“The two pending motions for a protective order (dkt. 95, 100) are denied without prejudice.”

Motion for protective order (unclear) Denied
Motion to seal (unclear) Denied

“The motion to seal portions of the dkt. 95 motion for a protective order (dkt. 94) is also denied. No good cause for sealing was articulated.”

Samuel Love v. Biuon Inc.
3:19-cv-00987-AGT · 2021-05-10
Motion for sanctions (defendant) Denied

“Defendant's motion, whether styled as a motion for attorneys' fees or a motion for sanctions, is untimely. Defendant hasn't demonstrated good cause for its late filing, so its motion is denied.”

Mark Sablowsky, et al. v. Auto-Chlor System, LLC, et al.
3:23-cv-02555-AGT · 2023-07-28
Motion for sanctions (defendant) Denied

“The Court denies defendants' motion for sanctions. Plaintiffs' counsel didn't unlawfully solicit potential members of the proposed FLSA collective action, as defendants contend. ... Defendants' motion for sanctions lacks merit and is denied.”

Peter Strojnik v. BW RRI II, LLC
3:20-cv-03142-AGT · 2020-09-01
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Because Strojnik hasn't explained how he was harmed by the hotel's accessibility barriers, he hasn't sufficiently alleged an injury-in-fact. ... BW's motion to dismiss is granted. If Strojnik chooses to amend his complaint, he must file the amendment and the requested evidentiary support by September 30, 2020.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

  • As the initially assigned San Francisco magistrate judge, Tse draws a broad civil mix, qui tam / False Claims Act cases (consistent with his earlier federal-prosecutor background), ERISA trust-fund collections, Social Security appeals, ADA Title III access suits, civil-rights employment, consumer and contract disputes, securities, and copyright (including Strike 3 cases and DMCA Section 512(h) subpoenas), alongside criminal magistrate duties such as search-warrant applications.
  • The figures here are filing-to-termination case durations, not motion-to-ruling timing.

Pending matters in the official report

Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years2
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 202602
Sep 202500
Mar 202522
Sep 202401
Mar 202441
Sep 202300
Mar 202320
Sep 202201
Mar 202214
Sep 202103
Mar 202100
Sep 202010

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

How long civil cases take in this court

For the whole of United States District Court for the Northern District of California, not for Judge Tse: median time from filing to disposition of the civil cases the court closed in the 12 months ending September 30, 2025, as reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

CasesMedian time
All civil cases closed6,0177.7 months
Closed with no court action2,9555.5 months
Closed before pretrial1,9787.6 months
Closed during or after pretrial1,05215 months
Closed during trial3236.9 months
12 months endingCases closedMedian time
Sep 20256,0177.7 months
Sep 20249,24820.6 months
Sep 20235,4527 months
Sep 20229,46411.4 months
Sep 20216,4376.3 months
Sep 20206,88111.4 months
Sep 20195,6408.7 months

The table leaves out prisoner petitions, land condemnations, deportation reviews, recovery of overpayments and enforcement of judgments, and reports no median for fewer than 10 cases. A district that closed a large multidistrict litigation in the period shows very large counts and long medians for that year. Source: Table C-5, U.S. District Courts (spreadsheet).

Draft for Judge Tse with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Tse, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Tse's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace