Wiley Blount Rutledge Jr.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit circuit Retired 1943 · served 1939–1943 Appointed by Franklin D. Roosevelt (Democratic) 25 signed orders read

Judge Rutledge no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Rutledge decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Rutledge deferred to an agency's supported choice where Congress had committed a close line-drawing question to administrative discretion.

“The decision in such circumstances is a delicate one and has been delegated by Congress to the Board.”

He left disputed negligence questions to the jury when the evidence supported competing inferences.

“We cannot say as a matter of law that the jury was wrong in finding decedent not contributorily negligent.”

Procedural preferences

Rutledge treated litigation stipulations as subject to the court's equitable control when enforcement would work injustice.

“It is settled that a court cannot be deprived by stipulation of its power to give equitable relief.”

He required meaningful representation after an adjudicated person filed a facially sufficient habeas petition.

“It is the court’s duty, therefore, when a sufficient petition has been filed and its power thereby brought into play, to appoint either a guardian or counsel to represent the petitioner in the further stages of the proceeding.”

Cautions

Rutledge rejected institutional charity as a categorical shield from responsibility for negligent conduct.

“The incorporated charity should respond as do private individuals, business corporations and others, when it does good in the wrong way.”

He treated an unperfected appellate record as a decisive barrier after the appellant had ample opportunity to correct it.

“Since appellant has had more than ample opportunity to submit a narrative which the trial court will approve and has not done so, the record obviously cannot be perfected.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

International Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board
· 1939-11-20
Petition for review (petitioner) Denied

“The order of the Board is affirmed.”

Clawans v. White
· 1940-02-05
Appeal (appellant) Moot / procedural

“Appeal dismissed.”

Coupe v. United States
· 1940-04-08
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The judgment is affirmed”

District of Columbia v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.
· 1940-05-13
Petition for review (petitioner) Denied

“The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals of the District of Columbia is affirmed.”

Nelson v. Ickes
· 1940-05-20
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The judgment is affirmed”

Farley v. Abbetmeier
· 1940-06-17
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“The action of the lower court is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.”

Faulks v. Schrider
· 1940-06-28
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Miller v. Miller
· 1940-07-22
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.”

Philadelphia, B. & W. R. R. v. Hazen
· 1940-10-14
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The judgment of the trial court is affirmed”

Baltimore & O. R. R. v. Corbin
· 1940-12-09
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The judgment is affirmed.”

Laughlin v. Berens
· 1940-12-23
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“The order is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.”

Nolde & Horst Co. v. Helvering
· 1941-06-30
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The judgment is affirmed”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Not applicable to this circuit-court record.

A historical record

Judge Rutledge no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.