Spottswood W. Robinson III

How Judge Robinson rules, drawn from 27 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Robinson no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Position
Circuit judge
Status
Deceased
Served
1966–1998
Appointed by
Lyndon B. Johnson (Democratic)
Commissioned
November 3, 1966
Education
Virginia Union University (B.A.); Howard University School of Law (LL.B., 1939)
Signed orders read
27

About Judge Robinson

Spottswood William Robinson, III was a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Appointed by President Lyndon B. Johnson, Judge Robinson received a commission on November 3, 1966. Judge Robinson previously served on the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, commissioned there on July 2, 1964. Judge Robinson assumed senior status on September 1, 1989 and served until death on October 11, 1998.

How Judge Robinson decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

For informed consent, measures whether a treatment risk matters by its likely significance to a reasonable patient in the particular patient’s position.

“[a] risk is thus material when a reasonable person, in what the physician knows or should know to be the patient’s position, would be likely to attach significance to the risk”

Procedural preferences

Allows an employee’s Title VII claim to proceed when she alleges that her job was abolished after she resisted a supervisor’s sexual advances.

“that formulation advances a prima facie case of sex discrimination within the purview of Title VII.”

Cautions

Checks an environmental agency’s warranty requirement against the authority Congress actually granted and rejects the provision found outside it.

“We conclude that the challenged warranty provision is unauthorized.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Hansford P. Miller v. Jackson Avirom
· 1967-06-28
Appeal (appellant (property owner Hansford P. Miller)) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Landella Kanelos v. Milton Kettler
· 1968-10-02
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff tenant Landella Kanelos)) Granted

“Reversed and remanded for a new trial.”

Arlene B. Becker v. Colonial Parking, Inc.
· 1969-01-27
Appeal (appellants (plaintiffs Arlene B. and Julius Becker)) Granted

“Reversed and remanded with directions.”

United States v. Edgar L. Hamilton
· 1969-07-24
Appeal (appellant (defendant Edgar L. Hamilton)) Denied

“We disagree, and accordingly we affirm the conviction.”

James A. Baker v. Walter E. Washington
· 1971-08-11
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff inmate James A. Baker)) Granted in part

“The dismissal of the District of Columbia is reversed, and as to it the case is remanded for further proceedings.”

United States v. Earl Cook
· 1972-04-03
Appeal (appellant (defendant Earl Cook)) Denied

“The judgment of appellant’s conviction is accordingly Affirmed.”

Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body Corporate
· 1972-07-20
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Jerry W. Canterbury)) Granted

“Reversed and remanded for a new trial.”

United States v. Thomas B. Dixon, United States of America v. Reginald T. Smith
· 1972-10-25
Appeal (appellants (defendants Thomas B. Dixon and Reginald T. Smith)) Denied

“the convictions under review are accordingly Affirmed.”

United States v. Eddie W. Jackson
· 1975-03-05
Appeal (appellant (defendant Eddie W. Jackson)) Granted in part

“we remand the case for reconsideration.”

James R. Tygrett v. Walter E. Washington, Commissioner, District of Columbia
· 1976-04-08
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff James R. Tygrett)) Granted

“The judgment appealed from is reversed, and the case is remanded to the District Court for further proceedings in harmony with this opinion.”

United States v. Gregory Hurt
· 1976-04-22
Appeal (appellant (defendant Gregory Hurt)) Granted

“The District Court’s ruling on remand is vacated, and appellant’s affidavit is again remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Paulette L. Barnes v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency
· 1977-07-27
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Paulette L. Barnes)) Granted

“The judgment appealed from is accordingly reversed, and the case is remanded to the District Court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

A historical record

Judge Robinson no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.