Ruth Bader Ginsburg

U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit circuit Retired 1993 · served 1980–1993 Appointed by Jimmy Carter (Democratic) 25 signed orders read

Judge Ginsburg no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Ginsburg decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

She declined to treat a temporary workplace-rule violation as severing the connection between employment conditions and an on-premises injury.

“assuming the facts to have been as stated by the AU, the employee’s alleged misconduct did not sever the relationship between the employment circumstances and the injury.”

She expressly limited the reach of a preclusion ruling to the repeated challenge actually presented.

“We stress, in conclusion, the narrow compass of our disposition.”

Cautions

She emphasized that a successful constitutional challenge does not itself satisfy every statutory route to a fee award.

“But the Equal Access to Justice Act is not all-encompassing.”

She made clear that a jurisdictional ruling rested on the developed record and left other defenses open.

“Our decision is based on the record as it now stands.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Steinberg v. International Criminal Police Organization
· 1982-02-16
Appeal (Leon Steinberg) Granted

“The judgment of the district court is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Western Coal Traffic League v. Interstate Commerce Commission
· 1984-05-22
Petition for review (Western Coal Traffic League and consolidated petitioners) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Grace v. Burger
· 1985-06-07
Appeal (Mary Terese Grace and Thaddeus Zwicki) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Automated Datatron, Inc. v. Woodcock
· 1981-07-08
Appeal (Kenneth H. Woodcock) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Chase v. Pan-Pacific Broadcasting, Inc.
· 1984-12-18
Appeal (Miko Enterprises, Inc. and the individual defendants) Granted

“For the reasons stated, the order under review is reversed, and the case is remanded to the district court for prompt airing and decision of the objections to personal jurisdiction raised by Miko and the individual defendants.”

Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
· 1982-03-02
Petition for review (Baltimore Gas and Electric Company) Moot / procedural

“The petition for review tenders an issue not ripe for judicial consideration. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.”

United States v. Russell
· 1981-05-15
Appeal (Charles M. Russell) Granted in part

“In accordance with the foregoing, the decision of the district court is affirmed in part and reversed in part.”

United States v. Gibson
· 1980-11-24
Appeal (Bernard Gibson and Deborah Y. Hagans) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Melton Truck Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
· 1980-11-24
Petition for review (Melton Truck Lines, Inc.) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Londrigan v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
· 1983-12-13
Appeal (Federal Bureau of Investigation) Granted

“Because the FBI has now demon-; strated with respect to Londrigan’s background investigation all that we could reasonably expect it to show to establish an implied promise, 6 we reverse the district court’s judgment. Further, we direct the district court, on remand, to enter judgment for the FBI.”

California Association of the Physically Handicapped, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
· 1985-12-10
Appeal (California Association of the Physically Handicapped, Inc.) Moot / procedural

“we dismiss the appeal on that account.”

Durrah v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
· 1985-04-30
Petition for review (Michael L. Durrah) Granted

“We therefore reverse the BRB’s decision and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Not applicable to this circuit-court record.

A historical record

Judge Ginsburg no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.