Laurence Hirsch Silberman

How Judge Silberman rules, drawn from 28 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Silberman no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Position
Circuit judge
Status
Deceased
Served
1985–2022
Appointed by
Ronald Reagan (Republican)
Commissioned
October 28, 1985
Education
Dartmouth College (A.B., 1957); Harvard Law School (LL.B., 1961)
Signed orders read
28

About Judge Silberman

Laurence Hirsch Silberman was a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Appointed by President Ronald Reagan, Judge Silberman received a commission on October 28, 1985. Judge Silberman assumed senior status on November 1, 2000 and served until death on October 2, 2022.

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Parker v. District of Columbia
04-7041 · 2007-03-09
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“We reverse.”

Seven-Sky v. Holder
11-5047 · 2011-11-08
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Despite questions raised as to our subject matter jurisdiction, we conclude we have jurisdiction, and we affirm the district court's conclusion that the Act is constitutional.”

St. Helena Clear Lake Hospital v. Becerra
21-5117 · 2022-04-08
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“For the reasons we set forth above, we affirm the district court.”

Kimberly Springsteen-Abbott v. SEC
20-1092 · 2021-02-26
Petition for review (petitioner) Denied

“The petition is dismissed in part and denied in part.”

Board of County Commissioners of Washington County v. Department of Transportation
19-1210 · 2020-04-07
Petition for review (petitioner) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, we deny the petition for review.”

United States v. Floyd Clark
19-3040 · 2020-10-16
Appeal (appellant) Moot / procedural

“But we think neither Party's arguments are persuasive, so we dismiss the appeal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.”

Aircraft Service International, Inc. v. FERC
20-1013 · 2021-01-22
Petition for review (petitioner) Denied

“We easily reject the petition.”

Phoenix Herpetological Society, Inc. v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
20-5161 · 2021-06-04
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“But the record backs the agency's findings, and its conclusions follow logically. We affirm.”

Hemp Industries Association v. Drug Enforcement Administration
20-1376 · 2022-06-10
Petition for review (petitioner) Moot / procedural

“Accordingly, we dismiss the petition.”

LePage's 2000, Inc. v. Postal Regulatory Commission
10-1031, 10-1033, 10-1279, 10-1294 · 2011-06-07
Petition for review (petitioner) Granted

“We therefore grant the parties' petitions for review, vacate the Commission's order, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

The City of Miami, Oklahoma v. FERC
20-1325 · 2022-01-18
Petition for review (petitioner) Granted

“We grant the City's petitions and remand for further proceedings to the agency.”

Alliance for Cannabis Therapeutics v. Drug Enforcement Administration
90-1019 · 1991-04-26
Petition for review (petitioner) Granted

“We think that the Administrator's interpretation of the statute was in the main acceptable, but he appears to have relied on several factors that are unreasonable because logically impossible to satisfy; therefore, we remand.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Circuit judges do not carry a trial caseload; not enumerated.

A historical record

Judge Silberman no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.