George Edward MacKinnon

U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit circuit Deceased · served 1969–1995 Appointed by Richard M. Nixon (Republican) 30 signed orders read

Judge MacKinnon no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge MacKinnon decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Reads statutory text closely and refuses to imply exceptions Congress did not enact, invoking canons such as expressio unius to hold that an enumerated list of exceptions is exclusive.

“Congress' specific enumeration of certain exceptions indicates that no other exceptions were intended.”

Looks to the substance and realities of a transaction or claim rather than the labels the parties attach to it.

“Lyeth holds that it is the realities of the claim that control the characterization of the subsequent compromise or settlement, not the labels of the parties.”

Procedural preferences

Extends substantial deference to an agency's interpretation of its own certificates, rules, and orders, upholding them unless clearly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation.

“It is standard law that the ICC's interpretation of a certificate should not be set aside unless it is clearly erroneous.”

Expects litigants to build and preserve a proper record below, declining relief where a party failed to develop the point in the trial court.

“If appellant desires to press the matter further it is incumbent upon him to make a proper record in the District Court which he is permitted to do in a proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.”

Cautions

Construes statutory time limits and jurisdictional prerequisites strictly, declining to toll or extend them absent express statutory authorization.

“Where a time limitation is jurisdictional, it must be strictly construed and will not be tolled or extended on account of fraud.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. B. Frank Joy Co.
· 1970-02-05
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“For the same reasons we affirm.”

United States v. Wendell McIntosh
· 1970-03-11
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

In re Estate of Symonds (Elam v. Leach)
· 1970-03-20
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Elrick v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
· 1973-09-10
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“Reversed.”

United States v. Marino J. Maturo
· 1976-06-01
Appeal (appellant) Granted in part

“The ease is remanded to the district court for disposition consistent with this opinion.”

McGraw-Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
· 1976-04-19
Petition for review (petitioner) Granted in part

“Although we affirm the decision of the Board, we are of the opinion that the order should be modified to recognize more clearly the scope of the company's supervisory authority.”

United States v. Rayfield Wilson
· 1976-04-15
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The action of the District Court in this case is affirmed.”

Builders Equity Corp. v. Hurwitz
· 1976-02-17
Appeal (appellant) Granted in part

“we affirm the decision of the district court in all respects but this one, and remand the ease for reconsideration of prejudgment interest.”

Regular Common Carrier Conference of American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
· 1977-06-02
Petition for review (petitioner) Denied

“the Commission's decision is in all respects affirmed.”

Basic Media, Ltd. v. Federal Communications Commission
· 1977-06-08
Petition for review (petitioner) Denied

“The three decisions of the Federal Communications Commission are affirmed in their entirety.”

Communications Systems, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
· 1978-12-29
Petition for review (petitioner) Denied

“We accordingly affirm the action of the Commission.”

Altman v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
· 1978-05-19
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The judgment of the district court is affirmed in all respects.”

A historical record

Judge MacKinnon no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.