Brett M. Kavanaugh

How Judge Kavanaugh rules, drawn from 37 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Kavanaugh no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Position
circuit
Status
Retired 2018
Served
2006–2018
Appointed by
George W. Bush (Republican)
Commissioned
2006-05-30
Education
Yale University (B.A., 1987); Yale Law School (J.D., 1990)
Signed orders read
37

How Judge Kavanaugh decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

An agency designation cannot rest on a thin record without a reasoned link between the evidence and the statutory date. A later isolated observation did not, without further explanation, establish that the property was occupied when the species was listed.

“Our conclusion in this case is thus quite narrow: The current record is simply too thin to justify the action the Service took.”

Expert testimony explaining the effects of prolonged abuse can support a duress instruction and establish prejudice when its absence undermines confidence in a conviction, even though deficient performance remains a separate question.

“And we conclude further that a duress instruction, together with the expert testimony, would have created a reasonable probability that the jury would have had a reasonable doubt respecting Nwoye’s guilt.”

Procedural preferences

An agency's regulatory objective cannot substitute for statutory authority. The operative text did not authorize mandatory replacement of substances outside the category Congress specified.

“Section 612 does not require (or give EPA authority to require) manufacturers to replace non-ozone-depleting substances such as HFCs.”

Cautions

Covered federal employees generally cannot use the Administrative Procedure Act to bypass the Civil Service Reform Act's exclusive procedures and limitations for challenging personnel actions.

“We have emphasized, moreover, that the CSRA is the exclusive avenue for suit even if the plaintiff cannot prevail in a claim under the CSRA.”

The passage of time does not itself eliminate the deliberative-process protection incorporated in Freedom of Information Act Exemption 5 because the statute contains no temporal cutoff.

“We must adhere to the text of FOIA and cannot judicially invent a new time limit for Exemption 5.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Kay v. Federal Communications Commission
03-1072 (consolidated with 05-1290) · 2008-05-23
Petition for review (James A. Kay, Jr. (appellant)) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Grosdidier v. Chairman, Broadcasting Board of Governors
08-5181 · 2009-04-03
Appeal (Camille Grosdidier et al. (appellants)) Denied

“We affirm.”

Montanans for Multiple Use v. Barbouletos
08-5131 · 2009-06-05
Appeal (Montanans for Multiple Use et al. (appellants)) Denied

“We affirm the judgment of the District Court”

Camden County Council on Economic Opportunity v. United States Department of Health & Human Services
08-5396 · 2009-11-06
Appeal (Camden County Council on Economic Opportunity (appellant)) Denied

“We affirm the judgment of the District Court.”

Winslow v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
08-5228 · 2009-12-01
Appeal (John F. Winslow (appellant)) Denied

“We affirm the judgment of the District Court.”

Nyunt v. Chairman, Broadcasting Board of Governors
08-5127 · 2009-12-18
Appeal (Kyaw Zaw Nyunt (appellant)) Denied

“We affirm the judgment of the District Court.”

Pasternack v. National Transportation Safety Board
09-1139 · 2010-02-26
Petition for review (Fred Leroy Pasternack (petitioner)) Granted

“We grant Pasternack’s petition, vacate the Board’s decision, and remand to the Board for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

American Trucking Associations v. Environmental Protection Agency
08-1144 · 2010-04-02
Petition for review (American Trucking Associations (petitioner)) Denied

“We deny ATA’s petition for review.”

Washington Gas Light Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
09-1100 · 2010-04-27
Petition for review (Washington Gas Light Company (petitioner)) Denied

“FERC has satisfied our remand order, and we deny Washington Gas Light Company’s petition for review.”

Action Alliance of Senior Citizens v. Sebelius
09-5191 · 2010-06-18
Appeal (Action Alliance of Senior Citizens, et al. (appellants)) Denied

“We affirm the judgment of the District Court.”

Schaefer v. McHugh
09-5187 · 2010-06-22
Appeal (Malcolm G. Schaefer (appellant)) Denied

“We affirm the judgment of the District Court.”

Hoopa Valley Tribe v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
09-1134 · 2010-12-28
Petition for review (Hoopa Valley Tribe (petitioner)) Denied

“We deny the Hoopa Valley Tribe’s petition for review.”

A historical record

Judge Kavanaugh no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.