Percy Anderson

How Judge Anderson rules, drawn from 4 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the Central District of California
Position
district
Appointed by
George W. Bush (Republican)
Commissioned
2002-05-01
Education
University of California, Los Angeles (A.B., 1970); University of California, Los Angeles, School of Law (J.D., 1975)
Signed orders read
4

How Judge Anderson decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In trademark disputes over expressive works he grants summary judgment under the Rogers v. Grimaldi test (artistic relevance above zero and not explicitly misleading), rejecting a 'cultural significance' gloss and deciding on the papers without oral argument.

“For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants Fox's Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court shall enter a Judgment consistent with this Order.”

Cautions

On de novo review he adopts magistrate recommendations dismissing state-prisoner 28 U.S.C. 2254 petitions with prejudice, including as untimely under AEDPA.

“IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; 2. Judgment shall be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Culver v. Director of Corrections
450 F. Supp. 2d 1135 · 2006-09-16
Motions to dismiss (respondent) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; 2. Judgment shall be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.”

Bovarie v. Giurbino
558 F. Supp. 2d 1030 · 2008-04-03
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed with prejudice. ... ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The final report and recommendation is adopted. 2. Judgment shall be entered consistent with this order.”

Dotson v. Scribner
619 F. Supp. 2d 866 · 2008-10-10
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“Having made a de novo determination, the Court agrees with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissed this action with prejudice.”

Twentieth Century Fox Television v. Empire Distribution Inc.
161 F. Supp. 3d 902 · 2016-02-01
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants Fox's Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court shall enter a Judgment consistent with this Order.”

Motions to strike (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“Because the Court rules in favor of Fox on First Amendment grounds, the Court denies as moot Fox's Motion to Strike and Empire Distribution's request for a continuance under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d).”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The reviewed 2026 assignments are dominated by pending alien-detainee habeas petitions, immigration mandamus cases, and pro se civil filings. Older reviewed matters include employment, prisoner civil-rights, disability-access, agency-review, copyright, contract, trademark, and criminal cases. The sole terminated valid matter in the refresh windows ended by voluntary dismissal.

Draft for Judge Anderson with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Anderson, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Anderson's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace