Michael W. Fitzgerald

United States District Court for the Central District of California district Appointed by Barack Obama (Democratic) 7 signed orders read

How Judge Fitzgerald decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In asbestos products-liability cases, applies maritime and federal causation standards, granting summary judgment absent evidence the decedent was exposed to each defendant's specific product.

“ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT”

On bankruptcy appeal, he followed controlling circuit precedent despite acknowledged policy concerns about its result.

“Whatever misgivings the bankruptcy court or this Court might have about the holding in Debbie Reynolds , it is controlling, and the bankruptcy court correctly applied it here.”

Procedural preferences

In patent cases, applies its prior claim-construction order on summary judgment and declines to re-litigate the construction, granting non-infringement and denying the invalidity motion as moot.

“the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement and DENIES AS MOOT Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity.”

Cautions

Reads insurance accrual rules in the insured's favor at the pleading stage, denying a limitations-based motion to dismiss where the claim accrues at the termination of covered disability.

“For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is DENIED.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Nelson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp.
2:12-cv-00793 · 2013-02-12
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT”

Uniloc Luxembourg v. eClinicalWorks, LLC
2:11-cv-10122 · 2013-08-29
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement and DENIES AS MOOT Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Moot / procedural

“DENIES AS MOOT Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity.”

Almont Ambulatory Surgery Center, LLC v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
2:14-cv-03053 · 2015-02-12
Motions to dismiss (counter-defendant) Granted in part

“the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the Motion.”

Gray v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Co.
2:16-cv-09019 · 2017-05-01
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is DENIED.”

De La Fuente v. State of California
2:16-cv-03242 · 2017-10-04
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED.”

In re Wrightwood Guest Ranch, LLC
ED CV 17-895 / ED CV 17-947 · 2018-02-22
Bankruptcy appeal (appellants) Denied

“Accordingly, the Court AFFIRMS the Surcharge Order.”

Janette Beckman and LeeAnne Hansen v. American Airlines, Inc. and Sigsbee “John” Nelson
2:23-cv-07410 · 2024-10-03
Summary judgment (defendant American Airlines) Granted

“this Court granted summary judgment in favor of Defendant”

Summary judgment (defendant Sigsbee “John” Nelson) Granted in part

“Nelson, this Court granted summary judgment in his favor on the statutory claims”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

A removal-heavy general civil diet typical of the Los Angeles federal bench: insurance breach/bad-faith suits removed on diversity, lemon-law and other consumer-contract removals against automakers, employment-discrimination removals, ADA and Fair Housing accessibility cases, False Claims Act / qui tam matters, and the occasional state-custody habeas. Durations below are filing-to-termination for 13 terminated cases filed in 2021 (median about 373 days), not motion-to-ruling latency. Many of these cases resolve by stipulated dismissal after private mediation rather than by a merits ruling, which the durations reflect. Consistent with that pattern, of the contested dockets whose timelines were reviewed, most closed by stipulated voluntary dismissal after a court-ordered mediation rather than by a dispositive ruling (e.g. a COVID business-interruption insurance suit and a trademark suit both dismissed by stipulation before their pending motions were decided).

Put Judge Fitzgerald's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Fitzgerald actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Fitzgerald's own signed orders and cites them.