Autumn D. Spaeth

How Judge Spaeth rules, drawn from 13 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the Central District of California
Position
Magistrate judge
Commissioned
June 15, 2018
Education
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), B.A. in Political Science; University of Southern California Gould School of Law, J.D. (Notes Editor, Southern California Law Review); University of Southern California, Annenberg School of Communication, M.A. in Communication Management
Signed orders read
13

About Judge Spaeth

Autumn D. Spaeth has served as a United States magistrate judge for the Central District of California since June 2018. She earned a bachelor’s degree from UCLA, a law degree from USC Gould School of Law, and a master’s degree from USC Annenberg School.

Judge Spaeth's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Spaeth, as published on the court's website (checked October 8, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Contacting chambers

Parties and counsel are not allowed to contact the Court’s law clerks or to communicate with Chambers by any means, except as expressly provided herein or otherwise ordered by the Court.

“Parties and counsel are not allowed to contact the Court’s law clerks or to communicate with Chambers by any means, except as expressly provided herein or otherwise ordered by the Court.”

Filing

Mandatory chambers copies of all e-filed documents must be delivered to the chambers drop box located on the 7th floor (by hand or overnight courier) by noon on the following day, unless ordered otherwise.

“Mandatory chambers copies of all e-filed documents must be delivered to the chambers drop box located on the 7th floor (by hand or overnight courier) by noon on the following day, unless ordered otherwise.”

Motions

Civil motions shall be heard on Wednesdays at 10:00 AM, unless otherwise directed by the Court.

“Civil motions shall be heard on Wednesdays at 10:00 AM, unless otherwise directed by the Court.”

Discovery

Before filing a discovery motion, counsel must read and be familiar with Judge Spaeth's Standing Order on Discovery Disputes, which is available for download below.

“Before filing a discovery motion, counsel must read and be familiar with Judge Spaeth's Standing Order on Discovery Disputes, which is available for download below.”

Discovery

Before a discovery motion, counsel must confer by phone or in person; email exchanges alone do not satisfy the order.

“Emails and written correspondence may supplement, but shall not replace, required telephonic and in-person conferences of counsel to resolve discovery disputes.”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 8, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Spaeth decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In the Segura Castillo extradition matter, she found probable cause to support certification of the requested extradition.

“The Court finds probable cause exists to support certifying the extradition of Relator.”

For previously released immigration detainees, a procedural due-process violation supported a prompt individualized bond hearing rather than automatic release.

“The Court finds that Petitioner was entitled to notice and a hearing before the revocation of his release.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Monique M. Perez v. Andrew M. Saul
2:21-cv-02586 · 2022-09-07
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is reversed and the matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order of Remand.”

United States v. Prudencio Segura Castillo
8:24-cv-01849 · 2025-04-16
Extradition certification (United States) Granted

“The Court finds probable cause exists to support certifying the extradition of Relator. The Court will issue a separate order certifying Prudencio Segura Castillo for extradition to Mexico on the charges of sexual abuse against V.R.S.”

Diana L Stowell v. Andrew M. Saul
5:19-cv-01255 · 2020
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Denied

“The decision of the Social Security Commissioner is AFFIRMED”

Leobardo Espinoza v. Commissioner of Social Security
2:25-cv-01065 · 2026-03-30
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Denied

“Social Security is affirmed, and this action is dismissed with prejudice.”

David Michael Phillips v. Martin O'Malley
8:24-cv-02181 · 2026-03-16
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Denied

“decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is affirmed, and this action is dismissed with prejudice.”

Maria Teresa Landa v. Leland Dudek
2:25-cv-01859 · 2026-01-05
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“Social Security is reversed, and the matter is remanded”

Alejandro Cisneros-Ruiz v. Markwayne Mullin
5:26-cv-04984 · 2026-09-16
Immigration habeas petition (petitioner Alejandro Cisneros-Ruiz) Granted in part

“ORDER GRANTING PETITION IN PART”

Shadia Alvarado Cuero v. Fereti Semaia
5:26-cv-03790 · 2026-09-10
Immigration habeas petition (petitioner Shadia Alvarado Cuero) Granted in part

“The Petition is granted in part;”

Application for temporary restraining order (petitioner Shadia Alvarado Cuero) Moot / procedural

“The Application for Temporary Restraining Order (Dkt. No. 15) is denied as moot;”

Yender Michael Vargas-Murillo v. Markwayne Mullin
5:26-cv-03579 · 2026-09-08
Immigration habeas petition (petitioner Yender Michael Vargas-Murillo) Granted in part

“The Petition is granted in part;”

Jeronimo Alvarez Sanchez v. Markwayne Mullin
5:26-cv-03414 · 2026-09-16
Immigration habeas petition (petitioner Jeronimo Alvarez Sanchez) Granted in part

“The Petition is granted in part;”

Joseph Luong Ngo v. City of Westminster
8:25-cv-00705 · 2025-11-26
Motion to dismiss for failure to state claim (defendants) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, the Motion is granted without leave to amend. The action is dismissed in its entirety.”

Wei Zhang v. Fereti Semaia
5:26-cv-05131 · 2026-09-18
Habeas petition (petitioner Wei Zhang) Granted

“The Petition is granted;”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 16 days (N = 2).

Median motion-to-ruling time: 81.0 days (N = 4).

The sampled consent matters include Social Security appeals, an extradition proceeding, and recently decided immigration-detention petitions. Newer detention filings include pending matters that are not part of the disposition count.

Pending matters in the official report

Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years0
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 202600
Sep 202501
Mar 202500
Sep 202400
Mar 202400
Sep 202300
Mar 202300
Sep 202200
Mar 202200
Sep 202100
Mar 202100
Sep 202000

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

How long civil cases take in this court

For the whole of United States District Court for the Central District of California, not for Judge Spaeth: median time from filing to disposition of the civil cases the court closed in the 12 months ending September 30, 2025, as reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

CasesMedian time
All civil cases closed15,1903.9 months
Closed with no court action4,4143.1 months
Closed before pretrial10,5384.3 months
Closed during or after pretrial10317.9 months
Closed during trial13525.7 months
12 months endingCases closedMedian time
Sep 202515,1903.9 months
Sep 202415,3483.9 months
Sep 202313,5834.4 months
Sep 202212,8874.7 months
Sep 202114,2134.7 months
Sep 202014,2055 months
Sep 201913,4784.9 months

The table leaves out prisoner petitions, land condemnations, deportation reviews, recovery of overpayments and enforcement of judgments, and reports no median for fewer than 10 cases. A district that closed a large multidistrict litigation in the period shows very large counts and long medians for that year. Source: Table C-5, U.S. District Courts (spreadsheet).

Draft for Judge Spaeth with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Spaeth, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Spaeth's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace