U.S. District Court for the Central District of CaliforniamagistrateAppointed by Judges of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California 10 signed orders read
How Judge Park decides
Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
What persuades
In one detention case, Park emphasized the petitioner's long record of successful supervised release and community ties when weighing the liberty interest against renewed confinement.
“Given Petitioner’s ties to the community and having no criminal record during his 12 years of supervised release, the Petitioner has a liberty interest in not being detained.”
In another case, she found the government's interest in withholding pre-deprivation process minimal where it identified no individualized risk justifying re-detention.
“the Government’s interest in refusing to provide such process is minimal.”
In sampled alien-detainee cases, Park required notice and a constitutionally adequate hearing before future re-detention when the government had previously released the petitioner under supervision.
“preventing her re-detention absent pre-deprivation notice and a constitutionally adequate pre-deprivation hearing at which the Government must justify the need to confine her prior to her re-detention”