William Cather Hook

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit circuit Retired 1921 · served 1903–1921 Appointed by Theodore Roosevelt (Republican) 25 signed orders read

Judge Hook no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Hook decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Hook treated a fully integrated written settlement as controlling and rejected a claimed contemporaneous oral obligation.

“The relations of the parties, the subject-matter and language of the contract and the circumstances surrounding its execution show that the parties intended it to be a complete memorial of their mutual agreements.”

He reversed a criminal conviction when the prosecution's evidence did not justify the verdict.

“We do not think the evidence sufficient to Justify the conviction.”

Procedural preferences

He assessed evidentiary prejudice in the context of the whole trial rather than in isolation.

“The question is one of practical effect, when the trial as a whole and all the circumstances of the proofs are regarded.”

He declined review when the losing party had not preserved a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence.

“It has long been established by the Supreme Court and by this and other Circuit Courts of Appeals that in the above circumstances the statute leaves no question open for review.”

Cautions

He deferred to trial-level factfinding when the trial judge had heard and observed the witnesses.

“It had an advantage in hearing the oral testimony and observing the witnesses, which we do not possess.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. Donovan Commission Co.
· 1906-04-16
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“Therefore, the decree of the Circuit Court is reversed, and the cause is remanded, with directioh to enter a decree in favor of the complainant.”

Minnesota & D. Cattle Co. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.
· 1906-07-09
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“For the, reasons stated in the opinion in the preceding case the judgment in this is affirmed.”

First Nat. Bank of Lincoln v. Penn Mut. Life Ins.
· 1906-08-27
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The judgment is affirmed.”

Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. Newsome
· 1907-05-13
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial.”

Tomlinson v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.
· 1904-12-07
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The judgment is affirmed.”

Martin v. Hulen & Co.
· 1906-10-06
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The order of the District Court is affirmed.”

Crites v. United States
· 1915-05-03
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“The sentence is reversed, and the ■cause is remanded for a new trial.”

Barnsdall v. Delaware Indian Oil Co.
· 1912-10-28
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The decree is therefore affirmed.”

Bigger v. Empire Water & Power Co.
· 1913-04-04
Appeal (appellant) Granted in part

“The decree dismissing his hill is therefore modified to be without prejudice, and as so modified it is affirmed.”

Seep v. Spade
· 1910-04-11
Appeal (appellant) Granted in part

“It is therefore remanded to the Circuit Court fór a like modification of the decree, and, as so modified, the decree is affirmed.”

City of Minot v. Walton
· 1910-12-19
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The judgment is affirmed.”

Wright v. United States
· 1912-05-06
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Not applicable to this circuit-court record.

A historical record

Judge Hook no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.