William Duane Benton

How Judge Benton rules, drawn from 43 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Position
circuit
Appointed by
George W. Bush (Republican)
Commissioned
2004-07-02
ABA rating
Well Qualified
Education
Northwestern University (B.A., 1972); Yale Law School (J.D., 1975); Memphis State University (M.B.A.); University of Virginia School of Law (LL.M.)
Signed orders read
43

How Judge Benton decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A narrow public-policy exception to at-will employment did not apply when the cited authorities did not clearly prohibit the employer's conduct.

“The public policy exception is ‘narrow.’ Id. at 93. After de novo review, this court agrees with the district court that Dubuque failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted because the manuals he cites do not clearly prohibit him from being debriefed in a SAP facility.”

Plain policy language controlled even when the insured argued that the resulting lack of coverage was unreasonable; ambiguity could not be inserted to create coverage.

“Castillo’s acts are not covered by the plain and ordinary meaning of the insurance policy here. See Engineering & Const. Innovations, Inc. v. L.H. Bolduc Co., 825 N.W.2d 695, 705 (Minn. 2013) (‘[W]e will not “read an ambiguity into the plain language of a policy in order to provide coverage.”’)”

Procedural preferences

A related municipal-liability claim could not proceed without a plausibly alleged underlying constitutional violation.

“Because Partridge and Schweikle failed to allege a Fourteenth Amendment violation, their related Monell claims were properly dismissed.”

An appellate claim was waived when omitted from the statement of issues and mentioned only briefly.

“Because Mahler’s brief does not include this claim in the statement of issues and mentioned it only briefly, she has waived this issue.”

The statutory 30-day deadline for seeking review of a removal order is a mandatory claim-processing rule that the court would not equitably toll.

“Section 1252(b)(1)’s plain text and statutory scheme rebut the presumption of equitable tolling.”

Cautions

A disparate-treatment complaint needed facts showing that the selected comparator was similarly situated and went through a comparable reinstatement process.

“Jones did not plead any facts showing that candidate was similarly situated or went through a reinstatement process. Her threadbare allegation does not survive a motion to dismiss.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Jose Gaspar-Felipe v. Merrick Garland
22-3372 · 2024-01-30
Appeal (petitioner) Denied

“The petition for review is denied.”

Robert Hall v. Paul Woodruff
24-1050 · 2024-11-19
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“This judgment is reversed and the case remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Steven Hill v. C V Rivera
18-3756 · 2020-12-23
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Hill's conviction was not untimely. ... The judgment is affirmed.”

United States v. Julian Bear Runner
24-2395 · 2025-04-24
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Sufficient evidence supported the jury's verdict that Bear Runner intended to defraud, steal, and embezzle.”

United States v. Jerome Koon, Jr.
24-2369 · 2025-06-12
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“Fex's requirement of 'actual delivery forecloses ... constructive delivery.'”

United States v. Darren Ackerman
23-1298 · 2023-12-08
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The room with the firearms immediately adjoined the area at the bottom of the stairs. The protective sweep complied with the Fourth Amendment. ... The judgment is affirmed.”

United States v. Dontavius Sharkey
24-1294 · 2025-03-12
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“This court's precedent forecloses these arguments. See United States v. Jackson, 110 F.4th 1120, 1125 (8th Cir. 2024) (holding post-Rahimi that 'there is no need for felony-by-felony litigation regarding the constitutionality of 922(g)(1)').”

Xzavier Clark v. United States
23-3104 · 2025-01-03
Appeal (petitioner) Denied

“Clark's facial challenge is defeated by controlling precedent. See United States v. Veasley, 98 F.4th 906, 918 (8th Cir. 2024) ... A guilty plea forecloses Clark's as-applied constitutional challenge. ... The judgment is affirmed.”

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. v. Larry James Moore
07-1315 · 2008-02-05
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d)(2), this court reverses.”

United States v. Rodney L. Harrison
05-3574 · 2006-11-30
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“The record here is not conclusive. ... The judgment is reversed and the case remanded.”

United States v. Joy Dayle Wessels
07-3550 · 2008-08-27
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The judgment of the district court is affirmed.”

Minnesota Majority v. Joe Mansky
11-1179 · 2013-03-06
Appeal (appellant) Granted in part

“This court affirms in part, reverses in part, and remands.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Circuit judges do not carry a trial caseload; not enumerated. Benton's pre-federal judicial service was on the Missouri Supreme Court (a state court, not in the federal docket record).

Draft for Judge Benton with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Benton, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Benton's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace