Clarence Arlen Beam

How Judge Beam rules, drawn from 26 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Beam no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Position
Circuit judge
Status
Deceased
Served
1987–2025
Appointed by
Ronald Reagan (Republican)
Commissioned
November 9, 1987
Education
University of Nebraska (B.S., 1951); University of Nebraska College of Law (J.D., 1965)
Signed orders read
26

About Judge Beam

Clarence Arlen Beam was a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Appointed by President Ronald Reagan, Judge Beam received a commission on November 9, 1987. Judge Beam previously served on the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska, commissioned there on November 18, 1981. Judge Beam assumed senior status on February 1, 2001 and served until death on October 31, 2025.

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Anthony Birdine
19-1782 · 2020-06-22
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the district court for further proceedings to consider whether to exercise its discretion and reduce Birdine's sentence.”

United States v. James A. Howard
19-2498 · 2020-06-16
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Accordingly, there was no reversible error and we affirm the judgment.”

United States v. Melvin Pryor
18-2627 · 2019-06-26
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The judgment of the district court is affirmed.”

United States v. Gabriel John Ayres
18-2534 · 2019-07-03
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Finding no error, and the district court's thorough § 3553(a) analysis reasonable, we affirm.”

United States v. Jeremy Allen Gatton
17-2276 · 2018-07-31
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Thus, we affirm.”

Starion Financial v. McCormick (In re McCormick)
15-1160 · 2016-02-01
Appeal (appellant) Moot / procedural

“Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.”

United States v. Garron Gonzalez
15-2127 · 2016-06-27
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The judgment of the district court is affirmed.”

United States v. Teresa Ann Kobriger
15-2641 · 2016-06-10
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“For the reasons stated herein, we affirm.”

Kenneth Stewart, Jr. v. Nucor Corporation
15-3597 · 2016-07-15
Appeal (plaintiff-appellant) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons we affirm.”

Debra Sue Jenner v. Kay Nikolas
15-2900 · 2016-07-08
Appeal (plaintiff-appellant) Denied

“For the reasons stated herein, we affirm.”

Cole v. Roper
No. 15-1751 · 2015-04-14
Appeal (appellant (State)) Granted

“Because the Missouri Supreme Court's adjudication of Cole's competency claim was not contrary to, or an unreasonable determination of, Supreme Court precedent, and because it did not involve an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented to it, we reverse the district court and vacate the court's stay of execution.”

Richard M. Smith v. Mitch Parker
14-1642 · 2014-12-19
Appeal (plaintiffs-appellants) Denied

“Accordingly, we therefore affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its well-reasoned opinion.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Circuit judges do not carry a trial caseload; not enumerated.

A historical record

Judge Beam no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.