William Howard Taft

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit circuit Deceased · served 1892–1930 Appointed by Benjamin Harrison (Republican) 25 signed orders read

Judge Taft no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Taft decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Enforces unambiguous insurance-contract language even under the rule of strict construction against the insurer.

“Strict construction against the company cannot destroy the necessary effect of plain language. Parties have a right to contract in this wise if they will.”

Requires a party seeking rescission of a speculative transaction to act promptly rather than await the venture's result.

“He cannot be allowed to remain passive, prepared to affirm the transaction if the concern should prosper, or to repudiate it if that should prove to he to his advantage.”

Requires every claimed element of a patented combination to appear in the accused device before finding infringement.

“in order to constitute the infringement of a combination, it must appear that the alleged infringing device includes every element of the combination as claimed.”

Procedural preferences

Requires a federal question to appear in the plaintiff's own statement of the claim.

“unless that appears by the plaintiff’s statement of his own claim.”

Requires the jurisdictional fact of alienage to be pleaded affirmatively, while permitting an amendment on remand.

“the fact was not made affirmatively to appear”

Permits a directed verdict when the opposing proof amounts to no more than a scintilla.

“The action of the court in directing a verdict was right, and the judgment is affirmed.”

Cautions

Uses a without-prejudice modification to prevent a dismissal from foreclosing a properly framed later action.

“without prejudice to the right of the plaintiff to tile a new suit upon the injunction bond”

Reviews preliminary-injunction decisions for improvident exercise of legal discretion.

“we should not disturb its action.”

Leaves disputed negligence, warning, and workplace-necessity questions to the jury when supported by the record.

“were all left to the jury by proper charges of the court.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Provident Savings Life Assurance Society of New York v. Llewellyn
· 1893-11-13
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, with instructions to order a new trial.”

Teutonia Insurance Co. v. Ewing
· 1898-11-09
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Judgment affirmed.”

Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Bentz
· 1900-02-12
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“The judgment of the court below is reversed, with directions to order a new trial.”

Kinzel v. Luttrell Brick Co.
· 1895-05-07
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The decree of the court below is affirmed.”

Leslie v. Brown
· 1898-11-09
Appeal (appellant) Granted in part

“Thus modified, the judgment of the court below is affirmed.”

Wabash Railroad Co. v. Barbour
· 1896-04-14
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, with directions to remand the case to the circuit court of Wayne county, Mich.”

Rondot v. Township of Rogers
· 1897-02-02
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, at the costs of the plaintiff in error, and the cause is remanded to the circuit court, with leave to apply for amendment, and further proceedings.”

Higgin Manufacturing Co. v. Scherer
· 1900-02-12
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“The decree of the circuit court is therefore reversed, with costs.”

Sagadahoc Land Co. v. Ewing
· 1895-02-05
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The decree of the circuit court is affirmed.”

Muhlenberg County v. Dyer
· 1895-02-05
Appeal (appellant) Moot / procedural

“The appeal is therefore dismissed, at the costs of the appellants.”

Blackmore v. Guarantee Co.
· 1895-10-09
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The judgment of the court below is affirmed, at the costs of the plaintiff in error.”

Vany v. Peirce
· 1897-07-06
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The action of the court in directing a verdict was right, and the judgment is affirmed.”

A historical record

Judge Taft no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.