Ransey Guy Cole Jr.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit circuit Appointed by Bill Clinton (Democratic) 27 signed orders read

How Judge Cole decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Scrutinizes ERISA plan administrators closely rather than rubber-stamping a file review: in reversing a long-term-disability denial, he faulted the plan's reviewing physicians for ignoring a treating physician's functional-capacity findings, mischaracterizing a positive nerve-compression test as evidence against disability, and making credibility judgments about the claimant's pain without ever examining him.

“A plan administrator acts arbitrarily and capriciously when it 'engages in a selective review of the administrative record to justify a decision to terminate coverage.'”

Applies the categorical approach with precision, parsing whether a state offense requires proof of a defendant's actual subjective intent versus a merely objective 'reasonably construed' inquiry, to hold a Tennessee sex offense broader than -- and not comparable to -- its federal SORNA tier counterpart.

“The Tennessee statute asks the jury to make an objective, rather than subjective, inquiry.”

Procedural preferences

In asylum 'unwilling or unable to control' analysis, insists on weighing BOTH the government's specific response to the applicant's own persecution AND general country-conditions evidence together, rejecting a narrower single-factor approach that looks only at how the government responded to the individual case.

“we must evaluate past persecution based on 'the overall context of the applicant's situation'”

Cautions

Applies Younger abstention strictly in domestic-relations enforcement matters, foreclosing federal injunctive/declaratory relief even where a plaintiff alleges bad faith by state child-support officials, unless the plaintiff can show truly extraordinary circumstances -- a disputed factual admission is not enough.

“if we declined to find the requisite 'extraordinary circumstances' to intervene in Sevier, where the plaintiff alleged injuries far more egregious than Tindall's, then a fortiori we are foreclosed also from reaching Tindall's claims.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Flagg ex rel. J.B. v. City of Detroit
715 F.3d 165 · 2013-04-25
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the judgment of the district court.”

W.J. O'Neil Co. v. Shepley, Bulfinch, Richardson & Abbott, Inc.
765 F.3d 625 · 2014-08-28
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“Accordingly, we reverse the district court's orders, vacate the judgment, and remand for further proceedings.”

Eberline v. Douglas J. Holdings, Inc.
982 F.3d 1006 · 2020-12-17
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“It failed, however, to correctly apply our decision in Solis v. Laurelbrook Sanitarium & School, Inc., which governs FLSA claims in an educational setting. ... We therefore reverse the district court's order granting summary judgment to the plaintiffs and remand”

United States v. Rudolph A. McClellan
164 F.3d 308 · 1999-01-05
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and REMAND for resentencing.”

Tindall v. Wayne County Friend of the Court ex rel. Schewe
269 F.3d 533 · 2001-10-15
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, we VACATE the judgment of the district court and REMAND this case with instructions to dismiss Tindall's complaint in its entirety.”

Kevin Mark Abela v. William Martin, Director, Michigan Department of Corrections
309 F.3d 338 · 2002-10-30
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court in denying Abela's § 2254 habeas petition because such petition was filed outside the applicable statute of limitations.”

Burt Lancaster v. Stanley Adams, Warden
324 F.3d 423 · 2003-03-26
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.”

United States v. Hunter Lee Williams, Nicholas Edward George and Geoffrey Hillman Leek
354 F.3d 497 · 2003-12-29
Appeal (appellant) Granted in part

“we REVERSE the decision of the district court to deny Defendants Leek and George's motions to suppress and REMAND this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. However, also for the reasons set forth above, we AFFIRM the district court's denial of Williams's motion to suppress.”

United States v. Placide
110 F. App'x 574 · 2004-09-08
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“For the preceding reasons, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.”

City of Wyandotte v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
262 F.3d 581 · 2001-08-24
Appeal (appellant) Granted in part

“we hold that the district court erred in granting the City's motion for summary judgment, and we accordingly REVERSE its decision... we AFFIRM the district court's denial of Conrail's motion for summary judgment on this ground.”

Administrative Committee of the Sea Ray Employees' Stock Ownership & Profit Sharing Plan v. Robinson
164 F.3d 981 · 1999-01-14
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“For the reasons stated above, we affirm the judgment of the district court.”

Pak v. Reno
196 F.3d 666 · 1999-10-06
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the district court's decision in its entirety.”

Put Judge Cole's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Cole actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Cole's own signed orders and cites them.