Martha Craig Daughtrey

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit circuit Appointed by Bill Clinton (Democratic) 34 signed orders read

How Judge Daughtrey decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In rejecting a county's 'officer safety' rationale for a warrantless perimeter search of a home's curtilage, frames the ruling in first-principles constitutional terms rather than resting on doctrinal balancing alone -- a recurring rhetorical move when she thinks a government litigant's position would 'swallow the rule.'

“But the Bill of Rights exists to protect people from the power of the government, not to aid the government.”

Procedural preferences

Consistent, pointed summary-judgment discipline: when a defendant's argument for affirmance itself assumes disputed facts resolved in its own favor, she calls out the error directly rather than merely reciting the standard -- the same discipline later visible in Hostettler v. College of Wooster (2018).

“the very formulation of the defendant's argument betrays the bank's misunderstanding of basic summary-judgment jurisprudence”

Cautions

Notwithstanding her reputation as a notable dissenter in the circuit's highest-profile capital and civil-rights cases, applies AEDPA's procedural time-bars strictly against habeas petitioners in ordinary (non-capital) cases -- attorney deadline miscalculation does not excuse an untimely filing, even where the petitioner personally did nothing wrong.

“Attorney miscalculation is simply not sufficient to warrant equitable tolling.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Memphis Center for Reproductive Health v. Slatery
20-5969 · 2021-09-10
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“we AFFIRM the district court's judgment enjoining implementation of sections 216 and 217 of the Act.”

Bennett v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County
19-5818 · 2020-10-06
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“The judgment of the district court is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Bennett v. Brewer
17-1574 · 2019-10-08
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court denying the petitioner a writ of habeas corpus”

Hostettler v. College of Wooster
17-3406 · 2018-07-17
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“Because all of these errors involve improper factual determinations, we REVERSE the order of the district court and REMAND the matter for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Antonio Coleman v. David Bergh
14-1459 · 2015-10-27
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“we now vacate that COA as improvidently granted”

Teresa Barry v. James O'Grady
17-3485 · 2018-07-11
Appeal (appellant) Moot / procedural

“We thus DISMISS the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.”

Richardson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
15-1142 · 2016-09-09
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“we AFFIRM the district court's grant of summary judgment to Wal-Mart”

Bridgett Handy-Clay v. City of Memphis, Tennessee
11-5518 · 2012-09-25
Appeal (appellant) Granted in part

“We therefore REVERSE that portion of the district court's judgment dismissing that claim, AFFIRM the remainder of the judgment, and REMAND the case to the district court for further proceedings.”

Millicent P. Hollins v. Methodist Healthcare, Inc., d/b/a Methodist University Hospital
05-6301 · 2007-01-10
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“we AFFIRM the district court's judgment”

Curtis Wheat v. Fifth Third Bank
13-4199 · 2015-05-07
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“We therefore REVERSE the district court's grant of summary judgment to the defendant and REMAND this matter for such further proceedings as are appropriate.”

Nancy Parker v. General Extrusions, Inc.
06-3353 · 2007-06-26
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“we REVERSE the judgment of the district court insofar as it sets aside the jury's award of punitive damages and REMAND for entry of an order in the district court reinstating and confirming that award”

Neil Morgan v. Fairfield Cty., Ohio
17-4027 · 2018-09-06
Appeal (appellant) Granted in part

“we AFFIRM the district court's decision granting summary judgment to the individual officers based on qualified immunity ... we REVERSE the decision of the district court granting summary judgment to the county and the county officials in their official capacities”

Put Judge Daughtrey's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Daughtrey actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Daughtrey's own signed orders and cites them.