Loyal Edwin Knappen

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit circuit Deceased · served 1910–1930 Appointed by William Howard Taft (Republican) 25 signed orders read

Judge Knappen no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Knappen decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Preserves a party's claim when evidence remains consistent with continuation of the original agreement.

“a failure to so indicate is not necessarily fatal to, or even inconsistent with, his claim that the original agreement still continued.”

Treats a fair trial and absence of reversible error as decisive despite multiple asserted complaints.

“The record impresses us that plaintiff in error has had a fair trial.”

Procedural preferences

Does not review a discretionary ruling absent an abuse of discretion.

“the denial of the motion is not subject to review'.”

Dismisses an attempted interlocutory appeal when the ruling is reviewable only with the final decision.

“its dismissal was therefore not the subject of appeal, in advance of final decision in the original suits.”

Cautions

Requires bad faith or failure to exercise honest judgment before imposing liability under a judgment-based standard.

“it should be made clear that they involve either bad faith or a refusal or failure to exercise honest judgment.”

Rejects patent protection when the asserted work falls short of invention.

“we think what Markel did fell short of invention.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Second Nat. Bank of Cincinnati v. Pan-American Bridge Co.
· 1910-12-06
Appeal (defendants plaintiffs in error) Granted

“Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered.”

Rode & Horn v. Phipps
· 1912-04-11
Appeal (bankruptcy claimants appellants) Granted in part

“As to these two excepted matters, the order of the District Court is reversed, and the cause remanded”

McIntyre v. Modern Woodmen of America
· 1912-11-07
Appeal (fraternal insurer defendant) Denied

“the judgment below is accordingly affirmed, with costs.”

Emery v. Central Trust & Safe Deposit Co.
· 1913-05-06
Appeal (cross-bill appellant) Moot / procedural

“The appeal is therefore dismissed.”

Goldman v. Goldberger
· 1913-11-04
Appeal (plaintiff in error) Granted

“The judgment of the District Court is reversed, with costs, and a new trial ordered.”

Schroth v. Monarch Fence Co.
· 1916-02-11
Appeal (bank appellant) Granted

“the order of the District Court should be reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded, with directions to dismiss the petition for'reclamation.”

Woo Vey v. United States
· 1917-06-30
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The judgment of the District Court must be affirmed.”

Dickinson v. Scruggs
· 1917-06-30
Appeal (defendant plaintiff in error) Granted

“The judgment must be reversed, and the case remanded, with directions to award a new trial.”

Avery-Loeb Electric Co. v. Markel
· 1917-12-07
Appeal (accused infringer appellant) Granted

“The judgment of the District Court is reversed, and the record remanded to that court, with directions to enter decree finding claim 1 invalid.”

Hanson v. Royal Ins.
· 1919-12-03
Appeal (receiver appellant) Granted

“The order of the District Court is reversed, and the record remanded to that court, with directions to disallow the claims”

Brafford v. United States
· 1919-07-02
Appeal (criminal defendant plaintiff in error) Denied

“The judgment of the District Court should be affirmed.”

Grandi v. United States
· 1920-01-06
Appeal (criminal defendant plaintiff in error) Denied

“The judgment is affirmed.”

A historical record

Judge Knappen no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.