Horace Harmon Lurton

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit circuit Deceased · served 1893–1914 Appointed by Grover Cleveland (Democratic) 25 signed orders read

Judge Lurton no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Lurton decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Requires jurisdictional facts to appear in the record and places that recording duty on the party invoking federal jurisdiction.

“whose duty it was to put on record the essential jurisdictional facts.”

Treats a homestead as an occupancy right that cannot attach without a present legal right to occupy the land.

“a homestead right, being a mere right of occupancy, cannot exist in land to which the debtor has not a present legal right of occupancy.”

Procedural preferences

Allows review of interlocutory rulings once an appeal is taken from the final decree.

“This was the only final decree, and an appeal from it brings up for review all interlocutory decrees in the cause.”

Preserves factual patent disputes for full proof rather than ending the case on a preliminary-injunction record.

“Ordinarily, if the case involve a question of fact, as of anticipation or infringement, we think the parties are entitled to put in their evidence”

Cautions

Gives substantial weight to a trial judge who personally observed conflicting witnesses.

“The fact that after such a hearing he found as he did is a fact of determining character on a record such as this.”

Does not treat merits pleading after a timely jurisdictional objection as waiver of that objection.

“He re*225fused to consent to the court’s jurisdiction, and at no time waived his right to be proceeded against regularly and in a court having jurisdiction.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Patton v. Clark
· 1899-12-04
Appeal (mortgage trustee appellant) Denied

“affirmed, with costs.”

The Penokee
· 1898-11-14
Appeal (intervening maritime claimants appellant) Denied

“The decrees appealed from will be affirmed, with costs.”

Felton v. Hamilton County
· 1899-11-13
Appeal (county appellant) Granted

“The decree will be reversed, and the relief denied.”

Burke v. Short
· 1897-03-02
Appeal (bond claimant appellant) Denied

“The decree must be affirmed, with costs.”

City of Cleveland v. Chisholm
· 1898-11-14
Appeal (municipal appellant) Denied

“The judgment is therefore affirmed.”

Wabash Ry. Co. v. Lumley
· 1899-10-03
Appeal (railroad appellant) Denied

“There is no error, and the decree will be affirmed.”

Monsarrat v. Mercantile Trust Co.
· 1901-05-07
Appeal (railroad receiver appellant in No. 853) Granted in part

“the decree may be modified so as to allow the claim to be established as a preferential debt”

Appeal (receiver appellant in No. 872) Denied

“The decree in No. 872, denying this claim as a set-off, is affirmed, with costs.”

Duff Mfg. Co. v. Kalamazoo Railroad Velocipede Car Co.
· 1901-07-02
Appeal (patent defendant appellant) Denied

“is affirmed upon the opinion of District Judge WANTY.”

Waterfield v. Rice
· 1901-11-11
Appeal (equity plaintiff appellant) Granted

“The decree must be reversed.”

Dennis v. Slyfield
· 1902-08-15
Appeal (maritime libelants appellant) Granted

“The decree dismissing the libel must be reversed, and the cause will be remanded”

Dennison Mfg. Co. v. Scharf Tag, Label & Box Co.
· 1903-03-13
Appeal (patent owner appellant) Granted

“Decree reversed and remanded for further pleading.”

Carter County v. Schmalstig
· 1904-01-18
Appeal (county appellant) Moot / procedural

“the appeal is dismissed.”

A historical record

Judge Lurton no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.