Henry Franklin Severens

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit circuit Deceased · served 1900–1923 Appointed by William McKinley (Republican) 25 signed orders read

Judge Severens no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Severens decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Treats positive identification evidence as especially weighty when citizenship and expulsion from the country are at stake.

“The identification of the appellant by the witness as the child of their acquaintance in San Francisco is so positive that we cannot feel justified in disregarding it”

Places the consequences of inseparably confused patent profits on the knowing infringer.

“It took the risk of confusion, and the loss must fall upon the wrongdoer, rather than the innocent party.”

Procedural preferences

Determines removal jurisdiction from the plaintiff's pleading rather than the later merits defense.

“the right to remove is determined by the case made by the plaintiff’s petition.”

Reserves patent validity for a developed evidentiary record unless the absence of invention is beyond reasonable dispute.

“we are unwilling to sanction the summary dismissal of the bill, for we think it possible that the merits of the case might be more clearly discerned in the light of facts which the evidence may bring out.”

Cautions

Requires counsel to choose the form of appellate review that matches the nature of the proceeding.

“The distinction between a writ of error and an appeal is important.”

Treats a prior appellate determination as binding law of the case on issues it decided.

“That decision became the law of the case upon all the questions determined thereby”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States Trust Co. v. Village of Mineral Ridge
· 1900-11-07
Appeal (plaintiff in error) Denied

“The judgment is therefore affirmed.”

New England Mut. Life Ins. v. Board of Com'rs
· 1901-01-08
Appeal (plaintiff in error) Granted

“judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause remanded”

A. R. Milner Seating Co. v. Yesbera
· 1901-10-08
Appeal (patent-holder appellant) Granted

“The decree will be reversed, with the costs of this court, and the cause remanded”

Louisville Home Tel. Co. v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.
· 1901-11-06
Appeal (defendant appellant) Granted

“The order granting the preliminary injunction must be reversed, with costs.”

Central Ohio R. v. Mahoney
· 1902-04-08
Appeal (receivers and railroad plaintiffs in error) Granted

“The judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded, with a direction to remand it to the state court”

United States v. Diamond Match Co.
· 1902-05-06
Appeal (plaintiff in error) Moot / procedural

“the writ of error in this case should be dismissed, and it is ordered accordingly.”

Village of Mackinaw City v. United States
· 1903-01-15
Appeal (appellant) Moot / procedural

“The appeal is accordingly dismissed.”

In re Muhlhauser
· 1903-03-18
Appeal (petitioners) Denied

“The order of the District Court must therefore be affirmed.”

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. City of Toledo
· 1903-03-11
Appeal (telegraph company appellant) Denied

“Its decree dismissing the bill is therefore affirmed.”

Rupp v. Wheeling & L. E. R. Co.
· 1903-04-15
Appeal (plaintiff in error) Granted

“the judgment of the Circuit Court will be reversed, and the cause remanded to that court, with directions to remand it to the state court”

S. Jarvis Adams Co. v. Bossert
· 1903-03-04
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“The decree must be reversed, and remanded to the court below”

Fletcher v. Burt
· 1903-12-18
Appeal (plaintiff appellant) Denied

“The judgment is affirmed.”

A historical record

Judge Severens no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.